Re: Missing feature in scp/sftp? (Was Re: scponly vs. vsftpd)

2005-10-16 Thread Dave Anderson
** Reply to message from Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:34:54 +0100 >On 16 Oct 2005, at 17:13, Dave Anderson wrote: > >>> That being said, FTP is well past the time it was designed for. >>> OpenSSH >>> is very stable and featurefull. Just make sure it isn't *too* >>>

Re: Missing feature in scp/sftp? (Was Re: scponly vs. vsftpd)

2005-10-16 Thread Gaby vanhegan
On 16 Oct 2005, at 17:13, Dave Anderson wrote: >> That being said, FTP is well past the time it was designed for. >> OpenSSH >> is very stable and featurefull. Just make sure it isn't *too* >> featureful >> for what you're doing. > > There _is_ one useful-to-me feature of FTP that I can't find

Missing feature in scp/sftp? (Was Re: scponly vs. vsftpd)

2005-10-16 Thread Dave Anderson
** Reply to message from Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:34:21 +0200 >That being said, FTP is well past the time it was designed for. OpenSSH >is very stable and featurefull. Just make sure it isn't *too* featureful >for what you're doing. There _is_ one useful-to-me f