Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-29 Thread Ben Calvert
On Aug 29, 2012, at 6:57, Mikkel Bang wrote: > I'm just thinking that from a layman's perspective named_flags="" > doesn't make as much sense as named=YES if all you want to do is start > named. I can't tell if you're trolling or not. Seriously, tho: is "uninformed beginners would think it sho

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-29 Thread Chris Bennett
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:22:38AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote: > Le 2012-08-29 09:57, Mikkel Bang a ?crit : > >If OpenBSD was on Git / at GitHub, youngins like me would have patched > >this baby up a long time ago. > > Sadly, a good argument against moving to Git. > > Simon > Whatcha 'git agi

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-29 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2012 Aug 29 (Wed) at 15:57:09 +0200 (+0200), Mikkel Bang wrote: :If OpenBSD was on Git / at GitHub, youngins like me would have patched :this baby up a long time ago. 1) Here's a nickle, go learn to use cvs. 2) We'd reject the patch anyways. -- Stop searching. Happiness is right next to yo

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-29 Thread bofh
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Mikkel Bang wrote: > I'm just thinking that from a layman's perspective named_flags="" > doesn't make as much sense as named=YES if all you want to do is start > named. > > The way it is right now seems more like monkey patching from the days > before OpenBSD becam

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-29 Thread Simon Perreault
Le 2012-08-29 09:57, Mikkel Bang a écrit : If OpenBSD was on Git / at GitHub, youngins like me would have patched this baby up a long time ago. Sadly, a good argument against moving to Git. Simon

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-29 Thread Tony Abernethy
Mikkel Bang wrote: >I'm just thinking that from a layman's perspective named_flags="" >doesn't make as much sense as named=YES if all you want to do is start >named. >The way it is right now seems more like monkey patching from the days >before OpenBSD became popular. I acknowledge the whole "it'

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-29 Thread Mikkel Bang
I'm just thinking that from a layman's perspective named_flags="" doesn't make as much sense as named=YES if all you want to do is start named. The way it is right now seems more like monkey patching from the days before OpenBSD became popular. I acknowledge the whole "it's been like this for ages

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012-08-25, Mikkel Bang wrote: > Hello! > > Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not > > pf=YES > sshd="" > named_flags="" > > but rather > > pf=YES > sshd=YES > named=YES? How about something like this? # system options pf=YES # daemons sshd_flags="" na

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-25 Thread Theo de Raadt
> > (For sake of the argument: pfctl has options, maybe they should be a > > rc.conf option for it?) > > pfctl is not a daemon per se, as opposed to e.g. smtpd or httpd. > > As far as enabling pf and loading the ruleset, only a subset of the > pfctl flags are of interest. > > Therefore, there i

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-25 Thread Alexander Hall
On 08/25/12 21:08, Robert wrote: On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:55:00 +0200 Mikkel Bang wrote: Hello! Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not pf=YES sshd="" named_flags="" but rather pf=YES sshd=YES named=YES? You may still want to be able to pass special

Re: More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-25 Thread Robert
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:55:00 +0200 Mikkel Bang wrote: > Hello! > > Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not > > pf=YES > sshd="" > named_flags="" > > but rather > > pf=YES > sshd=YES > named=YES? > > Thanks! > > Mikkel > pf doesn't have options for sta

More sensible and consistent rc.conf.local

2012-08-25 Thread Mikkel Bang
Hello! Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not pf=YES sshd="" named_flags="" but rather pf=YES sshd=YES named=YES? Thanks! Mikkel