On 24/09/2013 11:58, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 24/09/13 12:24, mxb wrote:
I'v seen this issue, but it just magically disappeared then I
re-configured ospfd and restarted on both ends.
I had an issue to see routes from area 0.0.0.0 on area 0.0.0.78.
Host A:
area 0.0.0.0 {
interfac
On 24/09/13 12:24, mxb wrote:
I'v seen this issue, but it just magically disappeared then I re-configured
ospfd and restarted on both ends.
I had an issue to see routes from area 0.0.0.0 on area 0.0.0.78.
Host A:
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface vether0 { metric 5 }
interface vether1
I'v seen this issue, but it just magically disappeared then I re-configured
ospfd and restarted on both ends.
I had an issue to see routes from area 0.0.0.0 on area 0.0.0.78.
Host A:
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface vether0 { metric 5 }
interface vether1 { metric 5 }
}
area 0.0.0.78 {
On 24/09/13 12:02, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Without this patch, routes to (lo2) and carpX:network where not
distributed. regards, G
My e-mail client somehow f@cked up Claudio's patch,
Here is the link to hist original post
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=137038436926946&w=2
G
On 05/06/13 01:16, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:43:21PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>> >On 01/06/13 18:44, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>>> > >Can you give this diff a spin? Not much tested but the current way we
>>> > >define an area as active (having at least one active neighbo
On 5/06/2013 0:16, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:43:21PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 01/06/13 18:44, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Can you give this diff a spin? Not much tested but the current way we
define an area as active (having at least one active neighbor) is wrong.
Thi
On 05/06/13 10:50, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 05/06/13 01:16, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Yeah, while the diff fixed the B flag it did not solve the problem
that we skipped our own networks. This version should solve that (at
least it does in my quick test). Needs lots of testing since this
change
On 05/06/13 01:16, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Yeah, while the diff fixed the B flag it did not solve the problem
that we skipped our own networks. This version should solve that (at
least it does in my quick test). Needs lots of testing since this
changes core parts of the route calculation.
First
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:43:21PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 01/06/13 18:44, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >Can you give this diff a spin? Not much tested but the current way we
> >define an area as active (having at least one active neighbor) is wrong.
> >This changes the decision to have at
On 01/06/13 18:44, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Can you give this diff a spin? Not much tested but the current way we
define an area as active (having at least one active neighbor) is wrong.
This changes the decision to have at least one active interface
(not IF_STA_DOWN). Not sure if that will cause tro
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 02:30:09PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:51:24PM +0200, Stijn wrote:
> > Hi misc,
> >
> > I've been playing with OSPF on OpenBSD and Cisco and there's
> > something I can't get my head around. I hope someone is able to
> > point my in the right di
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:51:24PM +0200, Stijn wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> I've been playing with OSPF on OpenBSD and Cisco and there's
> something I can't get my head around. I hope someone is able to
> point my in the right direction.
>
> Let me first explain the setup; output of the devices follows
On 31/05/2013 10:33, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 31/05/13 00:51, Stijn wrote:
Hi misc,
I've been playing with OSPF on OpenBSD and Cisco and there's
something I can't get my head around. I hope someone is able to point
my in the right direction.
Let me first explain the setup; output of th
On 31/05/13 00:51, Stijn wrote:
Hi misc,
I've been playing with OSPF on OpenBSD and Cisco and there's something
I can't get my head around. I hope someone is able to point my in the
right direction.
Let me first explain the setup; output of the devices follows at the end.
I have a setup of
Hi misc,
I've been playing with OSPF on OpenBSD and Cisco and there's something I
can't get my head around. I hope someone is able to point my in the
right direction.
Let me first explain the setup; output of the devices follows at the end.
I have a setup of two Cisco routers (IOS 12.4.25g)
15 matches
Mail list logo
