Re: OT: SiLK, libfixbuf and GPLR - Government Purpose License Rights

2014-09-28 Thread Raimundo Santos
On 28 September 2014 04:13, Ted Unangst wrote: > You are not the government, so instead the software is available to > you under the terms of the LGPL. > Thank you for the clarification. I got that it has nothing to do with GPL or FSF at all just reading the name: it is pretty clear, and scary

Re: OT: SiLK, libfixbuf and GPLR - Government Purpose License Rights

2014-09-28 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 03:39, Raimundo Santos wrote: > Government Purpose License Rights (GPLR) pursuant to DFARS 252.227.7013 > > I could not find good information sources about it. So, I ask: > > 1 - These kind of licences are meaningful by a Brazilian (i.e., USA's > outsiders) point of view?

OT: SiLK, libfixbuf and GPLR - Government Purpose License Rights

2014-09-27 Thread Raimundo Santos
Hello, I was to begin tests with FlowViewer ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/flowviewer/), which needs SiLK, which, in turns, needs libfixbuf, both from NetSA/CERT: http://tools.netsa.cert.org Are there anyone using these softwares? I am able to download only if I accept GPLv2 (or LGPLv2) and