Theo de Raadt wrote:
As far as I am concerned, yes we can email and complain, but they are so
arrogant that nothing will change.
Arrogant people change when their arrogance is too publically displayed.
Not only that, but arrogant people leave their jobs and sometimes the
replacements ar
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:17:58PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I am interested in this information as well. A list of recommended
> > products wold be great or something to that effect.
>
> A list of recommended products may help you, but would not help the
> user list at large. They will con
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:17:58PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> A list of recommended products may help you, but would not help the
> user list at large. They will continue to accidentally buy the wrong
> hardware from the wrong vendors. It would be a tremendous burden on
> us to keep such a lis
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 03:17:39PM -0400, marrandy wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2006 12:14, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I believe that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is another person who
> > is involved.
> >
> > These people will try to tell you that "there are parts of the
> > firmware that Intel does not own".
> I am interested in this information as well. A list of recommended
> products wold be great or something to that effect.
A list of recommended products may help you, but would not help the
user list at large. They will continue to accidentally buy the wrong
hardware from the wrong vendors. It
> As far as I am concerned, yes we can email and complain, but they are so
> arrogant that nothing will change.
Arrogant people change when their arrogance is too publically displayed.
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 03:17:39PM -0400, marrandy wrote:
> I want to know from the OpenBSD community, which products are best supported,
> which are the best (less cpu load, more bandwidth ie. more efficient etc.).
>
> I am really not interested in intel, adaptek and their games anymore.
>
> I
On Sunday 01 October 2006 12:14, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I believe that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is another person who
> is involved.
>
> These people will try to tell you that "there are parts of the
> firmware that Intel does not own". They'll say that positively about
> two of the firmwares, and want y
* Louis Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-01 17:51]:
> Louis Bertrand wrote:
> >Mr. Awad,
> >
> >As a user and supporter of open source projects, I am calling on Intel
>
> The address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced.
> Anybody have anything more current?
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mga01.intel.co
I believe that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is another person who
is involved.
These people will try to tell you that "there are parts of the
firmware that Intel does not own". They'll say that positively about
two of the firmwares, and want you believe that is the case for all
three. Then you can read the
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 11:45:57AM -0400, Louis Bertrand wrote:
> Louis Bertrand wrote:
> >Mr. Awad,
> >
> >As a user and supporter of open source projects, I am calling on Intel
>
> The address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced.
> Anybody have anything more current?
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mga01.i
Louis Bertrand wrote:
Mr. Awad,
As a user and supporter of open source projects, I am calling on Intel
The address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced.
Anybody have anything more current?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mga01.intel.com[192.55.52.88] said: 501
#5.1.1
bad address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (in re
Mr. Awad,
As a user and supporter of open source projects, I am calling on Intel
to revise its policy on distributing firmware and hardware documentation
for its wireless chipsets. The firmware binary bundle should be freely
distributable in its original form, without requiring users or
developer
13 matches
Mail list logo
