Re: OpenBGPD - advertised-routes (more)

2005-07-30 Thread G Douglas Davidson
On Jul 29, 2005, at 4:18 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:23:27PM -0400, G Douglas Davidson wrote: I'm having an issue announcing a "NO_EXPORT" network to our upstream and I'd like a way to prove that I am in fact sending the network in question (if in fact I am). It seems t

Re: OpenBGPD - advertised-routes (more)

2005-07-29 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:23:27PM -0400, G Douglas Davidson wrote: > >I'm having an issue announcing a "NO_EXPORT" network to our upstream > >and I'd like a way to prove that I am in fact sending the network in > >question (if in fact I am). It seems the "log updates" does not apply > >to sent

OpenBGPD - advertised-routes (more)

2005-07-29 Thread G Douglas Davidson
I'm having an issue announcing a "NO_EXPORT" network to our upstream and I'd like a way to prove that I am in fact sending the network in question (if in fact I am). It seems the "log updates" does not apply to sent updates, just received. Any suggestions appreciated. I utilized the dump up

Re: OpenBGPD - advertised-routes

2005-07-28 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:54:21PM -0400, G Douglas Davidson wrote: > I'm having an issue announcing a "NO_EXPORT" network to our upstream > and I'd like a way to prove that I am in fact sending the network in > question (if in fact I am). It seems the "log updates" does not apply > to sent upd

OpenBGPD - advertised-routes

2005-07-28 Thread G Douglas Davidson
I'm having an issue announcing a "NO_EXPORT" network to our upstream and I'd like a way to prove that I am in fact sending the network in question (if in fact I am). It seems the "log updates" does not apply to sent updates, just received. Any suggestions appreciated. -- G. Douglas Davidson