On 09/03/06, Florian Daniel Otel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I have the following question (== misunderstanding from my part?)
w.r.t. openbgp support for dynamic keying: I was living under the
impression (hope?) that the said support means not only that the keys
for the BGP peering
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:36:07AM +, tony sarendal wrote:
On 09/03/06, Florian Daniel Otel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I have the following question (== misunderstanding from my part?)
w.r.t. openbgp support for dynamic keying: I was living under the
impression (hope?)
Without ever having looked at this I would guess that openbgpd support
for dynamic keying is for securing the bgp session itself, nothing more.
Yes, this is correct.
*sigh*. There goes hopes for elegant BGP-IPsec VPNs, back to BGP over
GRE over IPsec.
Thanks Claudio, Tony for clearing
Hello all,
I have the following question (== misunderstanding from my part?)
w.r.t. openbgp support for dynamic keying: I was living under the
impression (hope?) that the said support means not only that the keys
for the BGP peering session per se are established dynamically but
also that the SPD
4 matches
Mail list logo
