Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue?? [RESOLVED]

2007-05-22 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 21.05.2007 at 18:00:30 +0200, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this problem worth opening a bug on the OpenBSD web site? after reading the great advice of Rob Waite, the answer is obviously NO. Sorry for the noise. Best, --Toni++

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-05-14 Thread Marcos Laufer
Rob , raising VM_PHYSSEG_MAX to 16 did the trick. I'm running stable 4.1 now. Thanks a lot for the sound advice ! Regards, Marcos Laufer - Original Message - From: Rob Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: misc@openbsd.org Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:04 PM Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-05-12 Thread Rob Waite
- From: Ben Calvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marcos Laufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 12:33 AM Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue?? On May 10, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Marcos Laufer wrote: I upgraded to stable , rebooted with the new kernel, and i was stuck with this uvm_page_physload

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-05-12 Thread Rob Waite
Oh yeah... I also noticed that others were trying the snapshot. I do not think you should run it at all. I only used it to see if the change to vmparam.h was likely to be the culprit. If you are getting the uvm_page_physload: ... increase VM_PHYSSEG_MAX error (and you wont see it easily... it

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-05-11 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:25:39PM -0300, Marcos Laufer wrote: I upgraded to stable , rebooted with the new kernel, and i was stuck with this uvm_page_physload problem again. It looks like moving to stable from this snapshot is not possible . I had to go back to the snapshot kernel . Will

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-05-11 Thread Marcos Laufer
Calvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marcos Laufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 12:33 AM Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue?? On May 10, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Marcos Laufer wrote: I upgraded to stable , rebooted with the new kernel, and i was stuck with this uvm_page_physload problem

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-05-10 Thread Marcos Laufer
like to have a production server running -current Has anyone sorted this out? Marcos - Original Message - From: Marcos Laufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rob Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 2:30 PM Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue?? I had the same

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-05-09 Thread Marcos Laufer
, May 02, 2007 9:52 AM Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue?? Yep.. the snapshot worked... I did not get a chance to try 3.9... I spent all last night making a new release... I was pretty sure that I only needed cd41.iso and the kernel but I went ahead and did the whole thing anyway. So now

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-05-02 Thread Rob Waite
help! Rob - Original Message - From: Tom Cosgrove [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rob Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:58 AM Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue?? Rob Can you try a snapshot? VM_PHYSSEG_MAX was upped from 5 to 16 at the end of March; this should help

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-05-01 Thread Rob Waite
One thing I neglected to include in my hand written dmesg was that amd64 seems to use CDBOOT 1.08 and i386 uses CDBOOT 1.06, unless my video capture made the 6 look like an 8. Maybe this is by design. Anyway.. I will stop flooding this board with my messages. Sorry ; )

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-04-30 Thread Ted Unangst
On 4/30/07, Rob Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a new computer so I was worried that the hardware was not supported. I popped in my OBSD 4.0 boot disk and it started up no problem.. so my question is this: Do the FTP sites put out some sort of incomplete boot iso before the official