Hi,
On Mon, 21.05.2007 at 18:00:30 +0200, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this problem worth opening a bug on the OpenBSD web site?
after reading the great advice of Rob Waite, the answer is obviously NO.
Sorry for the noise.
Best,
--Toni++
Rob ,
raising VM_PHYSSEG_MAX to 16 did the trick. I'm running stable 4.1 now.
Thanks a lot for the sound advice !
Regards,
Marcos Laufer
- Original Message -
From: Rob Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install
-
From: Ben Calvert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marcos Laufer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??
On May 10, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Marcos Laufer wrote:
I upgraded to stable , rebooted with the new kernel, and i
was stuck with this uvm_page_physload
Oh yeah... I also noticed that others were trying the snapshot. I do not
think you should run it at all. I only used it to see if the change to
vmparam.h was likely to be the culprit.
If you are getting the uvm_page_physload: ... increase VM_PHYSSEG_MAX
error (and you wont see it easily... it
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:25:39PM -0300, Marcos Laufer wrote:
I upgraded to stable , rebooted with the new kernel, and i
was stuck with this uvm_page_physload problem again.
It looks like moving to stable from this snapshot is not possible .
I had to go back to the snapshot kernel .
Will
Calvert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marcos Laufer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??
On May 10, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Marcos Laufer wrote:
I upgraded to stable , rebooted with the new kernel, and i
was stuck with this uvm_page_physload problem
like to have a production server running -current
Has anyone sorted this out?
Marcos
- Original Message -
From: Marcos Laufer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rob Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??
I had the same
, May 02, 2007 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??
Yep.. the snapshot worked... I did not get a chance to try 3.9... I spent
all last night making a new release... I was pretty sure that I only needed
cd41.iso and the kernel but I went ahead and did the whole thing anyway.
So now
help!
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cosgrove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rob Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??
Rob
Can you try a snapshot? VM_PHYSSEG_MAX was upped from 5 to 16 at
the end of March; this should help
One thing I neglected to include in my hand written dmesg was that amd64
seems to use CDBOOT 1.08 and i386 uses CDBOOT 1.06, unless my video capture
made the 6 look like an 8. Maybe this is by design.
Anyway.. I will stop flooding this board with my messages. Sorry ; )
On 4/30/07, Rob Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a new computer so I was worried that the hardware was not supported. I
popped in my OBSD 4.0 boot disk and it started up no problem.. so my question
is this:
Do the FTP sites put out some sort of incomplete boot iso before the official
11 matches
Mail list logo