Re: OpenBSD Makes Other Things Better (Advocacy)

2010-06-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-06-26, Jean-Francois wrote: > Le jeudi 24 juin 2010 00:56:09, Daniel Melameth a icrit : >> While most of us already know how the subject rings true, I still found the >> following from REBOL's CTO's public blog post interesting nonetheless (I've >> never used REBOL): >> >> "This was an int

Re: OpenBSD Makes Other Things Better (Advocacy)

2010-06-26 Thread Jean-Francois
Le jeudi 24 juin 2010 00:56:09, Daniel Melameth a icrit : > While most of us already know how the subject rings true, I still found the > following from REBOL's CTO's public blog post interesting nonetheless (I've > never used REBOL): > > "This was an interesting build, because it exposed a unique

Re: OpenBSD Makes Other Things Better (Advocacy)

2010-06-24 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:47:09PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:56:09PM -0600, Daniel Melameth wrote: > > While most of us already know how the subject rings true, I still found the > > following from REBOL's CTO's public blog post interesting nonetheless (I've > > never

Re: OpenBSD Makes Other Things Better (Advocacy)

2010-06-24 Thread Edd Barrett
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:56:09PM -0600, Daniel Melameth wrote: > While most of us already know how the subject rings true, I still found the > following from REBOL's CTO's public blog post interesting nonetheless (I've > never used REBOL): > > "This was an interesting build, because it exposed a

Re: OpenBSD Makes Other Things Better (Advocacy)

2010-06-23 Thread Andres Genovez
2010/6/23 Daniel Melameth > While most of us already know how the subject rings true, I still found the > following from REBOL's CTO's public blog post interesting nonetheless (I've > never used REBOL): > > "This was an interesting build, because it exposed a unique bug due to the > more secure m

OpenBSD Makes Other Things Better (Advocacy)

2010-06-23 Thread Daniel Melameth
While most of us already know how the subject rings true, I still found the following from REBOL's CTO's public blog post interesting nonetheless (I've never used REBOL): "This was an interesting build, because it exposed a unique bug due to the more secure methods of memory allocation on OpenBSD.