Re: OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-)

2012-09-07 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:02:13PM +0930, David Walker wrote: > Gilles Chehade > > We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD > > Which to my mind raises the question of how OpenSMTPD is to be > implemented alongside Sendmail in the base system. > Presumably, as per other items that a

Re: OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-)

2012-09-07 Thread Thomas Jeunet
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:32 AM, David Walker wrote: > Gilles Chehade >> We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD > > Which to my mind raises the question of how OpenSMTPD is to be > implemented alongside Sendmail in the base system. > Presumably, as per other items that are included

Re: OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-)

2012-09-06 Thread David Walker
Gilles Chehade > We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD Which to my mind raises the question of how OpenSMTPD is to be implemented alongside Sendmail in the base system. Presumably, as per other items that are included in base but not the default, i.e. DNS services, etcetera, ther

Re: OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-)

2012-08-21 Thread Alexander Hall
People replying to this, please don't keep up the cross-posting, but choose tech@ OR misc@. Or start a new thread. /Alexander On 08/20/12 23:01, Gilles Chehade wrote: Dear misc@ and tech@, We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD and now would be the perfect time for you to sta

Re: OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-)

2012-08-21 Thread Jan Stary
On Aug 20 23:01:44, Gilles Chehade wrote: > Dear misc@ and tech@, > > We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD and now would be > the perfect time for you to start stress-testing and trying to crash it > in various ways to make sure it is rock-solid. > > Eric's recent commits brough

Re: OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-)

2012-08-20 Thread Gilles Chehade
I use it on 5.1 but it requires a -current checkout of both src/usr.sbin/smtpd and src/lib/libc/asr bofh a écrit : >On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: >> Dear misc@ and tech@, >> >> We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD and now would be >> the perfect time

Re: OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-)

2012-08-20 Thread bofh
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > Dear misc@ and tech@, > > We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD and now would be > the perfect time for you to start stress-testing and trying to crash it > in various ways to make sure it is rock-solid. Does it make sense

Re: OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-)

2012-08-20 Thread Peter van Oord van der Vlies
Oord van der Vlies Van: owner-m...@openbsd.org [owner-m...@openbsd.org] namens Gilles Chehade [gil...@poolp.org] Verzonden: maandag 20 augustus 2012 23:01 Aan: misc@openbsd.org CC: t...@openbsd.org Onderwerp: OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-) Dear misc

OpenSMTPD getting closer to stable ;-)

2012-08-20 Thread Gilles Chehade
Dear misc@ and tech@, We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD and now would be the perfect time for you to start stress-testing and trying to crash it in various ways to make sure it is rock-solid. Eric's recent commits brought to the daemon a brand new scheduler and mta logic whic