On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:45:00 -0500 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
If I upgrade to -current, don't I risk stability and security issues;
or are the chances of that are very low as far as this OS goes?
(sigh)
If you run *any* software, you are running the risk of stability
and security
On 2010-01-02, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
If I upgrade to -current, don't I risk stability and security issues;
stable mostly refers to API changes; neither -current nor
-stable should be particularly unreliable (and security should
be the same or better in -current).
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:31:55AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Long
time ago I did try development versions of NetBSD and FreeBSD because
I needed support for hardware that -stable didn't have, and they were
quite shaky. Or do you guys just want more people to use -current for
the project
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:15:55 + Josh Rickmar
joshua_rick...@eumx.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:31:55AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Long
time ago I did try development versions of NetBSD and FreeBSD
because I needed support for hardware that -stable didn't have,
and they were
On 2009-12-31, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org wrote:
The right answer is backup your data, and do a fresh install of the
most recent -CURRENT snapshot.
Just a standard upgrade to a -current snapshot would also be fine.
On 2009-12-30, Tasmanian Devil tasm.de...@googlemail.com wrote:
If I upgrade to -current, don't I risk stability and security issues;
or are the chances of that are very low as far as this OS goes? Long
time ago I did try development versions of NetBSD and FreeBSD because
I needed support for hardware that -stable didn't have, and they were
quite shaky. Or do
I can compare OpenBSD to dev versions of OpenSolaris, DragonflyBSD,
NetBSD or some stable Linux distro and I must say that OpenBSD is more
stable and useful in its current version then any other OS in its
stable version. Read this http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors
and especially this
On 12/31/09, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:56:03 -0500 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/30/09, Tasmanian Devil tasm.de...@googlemail.com wrote:
Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
Downloaded, installed - same exact problem. Tried -alpha
Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
Downloaded, installed - same exact problem. Tried -alpha as well. Same
problem. I assumed alpha worked...
You're right! It seems I did give you bad advice. I'm sorry about that!
I tried on a patched 4.6 machine, and my tor-0.2.2.6-alpha port which
On 12/30/09, Tasmanian Devil tasm.de...@googlemail.com wrote:
Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
Downloaded, installed - same exact problem. Tried -alpha as well. Same
problem. I assumed alpha worked...
You're right! It seems I did give you bad advice. I'm sorry about that!
I tried
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:56:03 -0500 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/30/09, Tasmanian Devil tasm.de...@googlemail.com wrote:
Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
Downloaded, installed - same exact problem. Tried -alpha as well.
Same problem. I assumed alpha worked...
Hi.
The OpenBSD 4.6 errata OpenSSL TLS renegotiation patch
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.6/common/004_openssl.patch
breaks stable release of Tor as described here (exactly the same issue
on FreeBSD):
http://archives.seul.org/tor/relays/Dec-2009/msg00014.html
Tor is not vulnerable
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:16:22 + nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
The OpenBSD 4.6 errata OpenSSL TLS renegotiation patch
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.6/common/004_openssl.patch
breaks stable release of Tor as described here (exactly the same issue
on FreeBSD):
Tor is not vulnerable to the attack when used with the broken OpenSSL,
but the patch stops it from working correctly as described in the
above thread. The issue is fixed only in the alpha version of Tor, and
AFAIK won't be fixed in stable:
On 12/29/09, Tasmanian Devil tasm.de...@googlemail.com wrote:
It is fixed in Tor's stable release already:
http://archives.seul.org/tor/announce/Dec-2009/msg0.html
Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
Downloaded, installed - same exact problem. Tried -alpha as well. Same
problem. I
15 matches
Mail list logo
