Ospfd and CARP - route advertisement in ospf database

[Steve Johnson]

Hi,

I have a question regarding the ospfd route insertion in the ospf
database. I have 2 systems that have the same ospfd.conf
configuration, copied from the same CVS source, yet only 1 of them
actually adds them into the ospf database. This was validated with the
ospfctl show database self-originated. As expected, none of the routes
are in the database when the CARP interfaces are in backup, but when
in master, only one of the two system adds them to the database.
However, the one that does not add them still ends up propagating its
routes, as they show up in the routes of our Cisco device in the same
area, yet none of those routes are in its own database or in the Cisco
device database. The ospfctl show interface and the more specific ospf
show interface em0/carpxx outputs are also the same on both systems.

Here is the ospfd.conf:
# global configuration
no redistribute 10.120.250.0/24

# areas
area 0.0.0.0 {
        interface em0 {
                auth-type crypt
                auth-md 1 "ourospfkey"
                auth-md-keyid 1
                router-dead-time minimal
                demote fwdb
        }
        interface carp101
        interface carp102
        interface carp103
}

Any idea as to what could cause that difference between the two? Or
which other setting I could check? This is on OpenBSD 4.9

Thanks!