PF: table sync

2012-02-04 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Hi misc@, my question is probably directed to devs working with/on PF. Is something like table sync is planed to implement in PF? eg: "table persist sync" would sync all entries to the remote peer, inc. tracking add/del to it. //maxim

Re: PF: table sync

2012-02-05 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > Hi misc@, > > my question is probably directed to devs working with/on PF. > > Is something like table sync is planed to implement in PF? > > eg: > "table persist sync" would sync all entries to the remote peer, inc. > tracking add/del to

Re: PF: table sync

2012-02-05 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 10:39:59AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Maxim Bourmistrov > wrote: > > Hi misc@, > > > > my question is probably directed to devs working with/on PF. > > > > Is something like table sync is planed to implement in PF? > > > > eg: > > "table

Re: PF: table sync

2012-02-05 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > pfsync does not sync pf tables. Exactly, but it would be nice to have. //maxim

Re: PF: table sync

2012-02-05 Thread OSN | Marian Fischer
Am 05.02.2012 11:32, schrieb Maxim Bourmistrov: On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: pfsync does not sync pf tables. Exactly, but it would be nice to have. //maxim Hi, you should also take a look at wolfermann.org/pftabled.html Maybe that works out for you ... -marian

Re: PF: table sync

2012-02-05 Thread Camiel Dobbelaar
On 5-2-2012 16:01, OSN | Marian Fischer wrote: > Am 05.02.2012 11:32, schrieb Maxim Bourmistrov: >> On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: >> >>> pfsync does not sync pf tables. >> Exactly, but it would be nice to have. >> >> //maxim >> > Hi, > > you should also take a look at wolferman

Re: PF: table sync

2012-02-05 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
On Feb 5, 2012, at 8:17 PM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote: > On 5-2-2012 16:01, OSN | Marian Fischer wrote: >> Am 05.02.2012 11:32, schrieb Maxim Bourmistrov: >>> On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: >>> pfsync does not sync pf tables. >>> Exactly, but it would be nice to have. >>> >>>

Re: PF: table sync

2012-02-06 Thread Armin Wolfermann
* Camiel Dobbelaar [05.02.2012 20:19]: > I'm not sure that pftabled is still maintained though. It is. > I reported a big flaw to the author in 2010 and it was never fixed. Aborting on a failure condition is not a flaw. I told you in my reply to your code review that pftabled is running on hi

Re: PF: table sync

2012-02-06 Thread Camiel Dobbelaar
On 6-2-2012 10:52, Armin Wolfermann wrote: > * Camiel Dobbelaar [05.02.2012 20:19]: >> I'm not sure that pftabled is still maintained though. > > It is. > >> I reported a big flaw to the author in 2010 and it was never fixed. > > Aborting on a failure condition is not a flaw. Come on... it's