[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:40:31 -0500 (EST), Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>
>> All:
>>
...
>> Even if other hosts receive a packet and reply to it, they won't be
>> able to ARP for it, and if they could, the original OpenBSD box will
>> drop the reply with destination host/netw
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:40:31 -0500 (EST), Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>All:
>
>It may seem rudimentary, but no where in the FAQ or man pages is it
>explicitly stated that the source address or address pool of a NAT
>translation must be assigned to an interface.
>
>Obviously it can be either be a pri
All:
It may seem rudimentary, but no where in the FAQ or man pages is it
explicitly stated that the source address or address pool of a NAT
translation must be assigned to an interface.
Obviously it can be either be a primary address (such as 99.9% of the PAT
configurations on the Internet)
3 matches
Mail list logo