On 2005/09/19 14:30:14, Joe . wrote:
> I would check to make sure the nic is negotiating properly. It might
> be half duplex instead of full or something flakey etc. Check the
> output of ifconfig.
That would show up in netstat -ni (Vinicius says he looked there).
I have just been looking at a ni
From: Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> They say all their ifaces are forced to 100 full duplex, when i try to
> autoneg with their switches i always got 100 half duplex, and
> the speed
> is bad, so i forced all to 100 full duplex so i can get some speed,
> don't ask me why th
--- Quoting Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna on 2005/09/19 at 22:24 -0300:
> They say all their ifaces are forced to 100 full duplex, when i try to
> autoneg with their switches i always got 100 half duplex, and the speed
> is bad, so i forced all to 100 full duplex so i can get some speed,
> don't ask m
jared r r spiegel wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:13:33PM -0300, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote:
>
>
>>I tried to disable pf (pfctl -d) and it continues to loss packets
>>
>>
><...>
>
>
>>The count on in and out are different because the pf is blocking some
>>packets
>>
>>
>
> (?
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:13:33PM -0300, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote:
>
> I tried to disable pf (pfctl -d) and it continues to loss packets
<...>
> The count on in and out are different because the pf is blocking some
> packets
(?)
those seem to contradict one another., just a typo?
>
'netstat -in' will give you a better indication of duplex mismatches (since
it shows errors and collisions.)
-Steve S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The ifconfig and brconfig output is as follow:
From: Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The ifconfig and brconfig output is as follow:
> I have setup an IP adress on the networks so i can access the machine
> remotely and the rl0 is disabled.
>
> $ ifconfig -a
> em0:
> flags=8943 mtu 1500
> address: 00:30:48:72:95:1
The ifconfig and brconfig output is as follow:
I have setup an IP adress on the networks so i can access the machine
remotely and the rl0 is disabled.
$ ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33224
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixl
I would check to make sure the nic is negotiating properly. It might
be half duplex instead of full or something flakey etc. Check the
output of ifconfig.
Joe
On 9/19/05, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for the held Jared,
>
> I tried to disable pf (pfctl -d)
Hi,
Thanks for the held Jared,
I tried to disable pf (pfctl -d) and it continues to loss packets, i
changed the rules to use state on all and raised the limit on it to
about 300.000, so i think this is not a problem, and since pfctl -d
didn't resolve the packet lost i begin to suspect something on
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:17:04AM -0300, Vinicius Pavanelli Vianna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using OpenBSD 3.7 with pf and bridge enabled for a transparent
> proxy, and I'm having some packet loss somewhere in this bridge, since
> netstat -ni doesn't give me any ierrors
what about pkts? does the i
Hi,
I'm using OpenBSD 3.7 with pf and bridge enabled for a transparent
proxy, and I'm having some packet loss somewhere in this bridge, since
netstat -ni doesn't give me any ierrors i'm beginning to check PF setup,
this machine has about 30k packets/s, my question is: how can i see if
pf is ok wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
