WAY OT Was: Potential scripting engine to integrate into mg?

2013-12-05 Thread Diana Eichert
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, bsdclubho...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:58:56PM -, Edward L. wrote: So why don't we have python in the base? Perl is in there. Just curious, not that I'm requesting. :-) Thanks. Absolutely. We also need Ruby, Lua, Scheme, Haskell, Cython and Java.

Re: Potential scripting engine to integrate into mg?

2013-12-04 Thread bsdclubhouse
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:58:56PM -, Edward L. wrote: So why don't we have python in the base? Perl is in there. Just curious, not that I'm requesting. :-) Thanks. Absolutely. We also need Ruby, Lua, Scheme, Haskell, Cython and Java. That would be really great. But really: this is the

Potential scripting engine to integrate into mg?

2013-12-02 Thread Edward L.
Hello misc@ There have been discussions about extending mg with tinyscheme: http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=7262 Or with lua: http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20120723072952 What about with python? Any thoughts? Regards,Edward.

Re: Potential scripting engine to integrate into mg?

2013-12-02 Thread Theo de Raadt
There have been discussions about extending mg with tinyscheme: http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=7262 Or with lua: http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20120723072952 What about with python? So we should put python in the base. That would be great.

Re: Potential scripting engine to integrate into mg?

2013-12-02 Thread Edward L.
@openbsd.org Sent: December 2, 2013 12:53 PM Subject: Re: Potential scripting engine to integrate into mg? There have been discussions about extending mg with tinyscheme: http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=7262 Or with lua: http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20120723072952 What

Re: Potential scripting engine to integrate into mg?

2013-12-02 Thread Gregor Best
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:41:47PM -, Edward L. wrote: [...] Any thoughts? [...] For that, tinyscheme, lua or python would have to be integrated into base. That seems rather unlikely. What would be nice would be to take the Lisp interpreter from xedit and integrate it into mg. Xedit is in

Re: Potential scripting engine to integrate into mg?

2013-12-02 Thread Ted Unangst
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 20:58, Edward L. wrote: So why don't we have python in the base? Perl is in there. Just curious, not that I'm requesting. :-) It's totally reasonable for an operating system to include *a* first class scripting language. It allows us to build tools like pkg_add in that

Re: Potential scripting engine to integrate into mg?

2013-12-02 Thread Marc Espie
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:13:34PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 20:58, Edward L. wrote: So why don't we have python in the base? Perl is in there. Just curious, not that I'm requesting. :-) It's totally reasonable for an operating system to include *a* first class