On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > Please, please, please, can someone port ZFS, just to end this endless
> > thread...?
>
> Please someone port HAMMER instead. We are only interested in free
> software, with no strings attached.
>
YAY!!!
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/m
No, just end the thread.
--
There's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want it to.
> Please, please, please, can someone port ZFS, just to end this endless
> thread...?
Please someone port HAMMER instead. We are only interested in free
software, with no strings attached.
Please, please, please, can someone port ZFS, just to end this endless
thread...?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> What's much more funny is that Oracle is paying for training and
> support to Joyent to be able to offer at least some level of support
> in ZFS for its own customers :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zRN7XLCRhc
Funny rant half way through.
Yeah, can I order one? This thread is hilariously funny! I even managed to get
an entire car full of people laughing by reading it to them from my mobile.
Long live OpenBSD and long live ZFS - I love you both!
On 22 Feb 2013, at 16:18, Brian Callahan wrote:
> On 2/22/2013 8:02 AM, Ted Unangs
On 2/22/2013 8:02 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:42, Eric Furman wrote:
Until your name is on this list;
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/ports/geo/openbsd-developers/files/OpenBSD
YOU ARE NOT A DEVELOPER.
I'm making this into a shirt.
~Brian
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:42, Eric Furman wrote:
> Until your name is on this list;
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/ports/geo/openbsd-developers/files/OpenBSD
>
> YOU ARE NOT A DEVELOPER.
Now that's hysterical.
OpenBSD doesn't believe much in them, and doesn't need lkms for all basic usage.
It just didn't get disabled in case someone (like OpenAFS users) wants it.
It doesn't work on all platforms, either
2013/2/22 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado :
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:22:51AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:22:51AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:29:21AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
> > OpenBSD doesn't have support for loadable kernel modules or FUSE, so
> > OpenBSD should include the code inside of the kernel. This is a big
> > differenc
That proves nothing.
Until your name is on this list;
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/ports/geo/openbsd-developers/files/OpenBSD
YOU ARE NOT A DEVELOPER.
FUCK YOU!
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013, at 06:29 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2013/2/22 Eric Furman :
> > but Martin Schröder is not a
Please take personal insults off list. We are not interested.
--
Don't cook tonight -- starve a rat today!
2013/2/22 Eric Furman :
> but Martin Schröder is not a developer. So what is his word worth???
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#Journaling
Now go and fuck yourself.
but Martin Schröder is not a developer. So what is his word worth???
I don't know and neither does Martin Schröder.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013, at 04:23 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2013/2/22 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado :
> > Here in the BSD world, we have HAMMER, a good alternative with a license
>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:22:51AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:29:21AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
> > OpenBSD doesn't have support for loadable kernel modules or FUSE, so
> > OpenBSD should include the code inside of the kernel. This is a big
> > differenc
2013/2/22 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado :
> Here in the BSD world, we have HAMMER, a good alternative with a license
> compatible and a reasonable requirements.
Here in the OpenBSD world we don't have HAMMER.
Best
Martin
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:29:21AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> OpenBSD doesn't have support for loadable kernel modules or FUSE, so
> OpenBSD should include the code inside of the kernel. This is a big
> difference with FreeBSD/NetBSD/Linux.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb
On 2013 Feb 22 (Fri) at 09:27:59 +0100 (+0100), Tomas Bodzar wrote:
:On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
:> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:15:35PM -0500, Bryan Horstmann-Allen wrote:
:>> I apologize this is off-topic, but I'm somewhat close to the illumos project
:>> and would like
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:15:35PM -0500, Bryan Horstmann-Allen wrote:
>> I apologize this is off-topic, but I'm somewhat close to the illumos project
>> and would like to correct a few things.
>>
>> [...things corrected...]
>
> Well, thank
On 2013-02-21, at 11:21 PM, Eric Furman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Rod Whitworth
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:54:58 -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>> ...
lkm(4) is outdated with wrong information about a feature
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Rod Whitworth
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:54:58 -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> ...
> >>lkm(4) is outdated with wrong information about a feature no longer present?
> >
> > From cvsweb:src/lkm/ap/Att
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:54:58 -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
...
>>lkm(4) is outdated with wrong information about a feature no longer present?
>
> From cvsweb:src/lkm/ap/Attic/README
>
> Revision 1.3
> Mon Feb 24 22:30:12 2003 UTC (10 years ago)
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:54:58 -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
>
>> OpenBSD doesn't have support for loadable kernel modules or FUSE, so
>> OpenBSD should include the code inside of the kernel. This is a big
>> difference with Fre
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:54:58PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
>
> > OpenBSD doesn't have support for loadable kernel modules or FUSE, so
> > OpenBSD should include the code inside of the kernel. This is a big
> > differen
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
wrote:
> OpenBSD doesn't have support for loadable kernel modules or FUSE, so
> OpenBSD should include the code inside of the kernel. This is a big
> difference with FreeBSD/NetBSD/Linux.
lkm(4) is outdated with wrong information ab
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:15:35PM -0500, Bryan Horstmann-Allen wrote:
> I apologize this is off-topic, but I'm somewhat close to the illumos project
> and would like to correct a few things.
>
> +--
> | On 2013-02-21 22:1
> There is zero reason not to have ZFS in a free system. Consider its inclusion
> in FreeBSD.
Just because FreeBSD decided to compromise in regards to ZFS, does not
mean everyone else has to as well. They could include all sorts of
other code with similar licenses, yet there they often stand firm
I apologize this is off-topic, but I'm somewhat close to the illumos project
and would like to correct a few things.
+--
| On 2013-02-21 22:12:45, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
|
| > So, long story short, I do not see any option
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:15:35PM -0500, Bryan Horstmann-Allen wrote:
> I apologize this is off-topic, but I'm somewhat close to the illumos project
> and would like to correct a few things.
>
> [...things corrected...]
Well, thank you very much for correcting me and providing us high quality
in
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Matthias Appel wrote:
>
> Yupp, I think, that's (beside the CDDL part of ZFS) it the major
> turn-off in any kind of productive enviroment.
>
> At the moment I don't know how FreeBSD handles the ZFS development, but
> maintaining a not-really-fully-ZFS
30 matches
Mail list logo
