hmm, on Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 01:28:31PM +1100, Rod Whitworth said that
> So it's easy to remember 0 is for 0utside, 1 is for 1nside and 2 is for
> 2ervers.
that is really nice actually. now i appreciate the blanket numbering more.
-f
--
has a room temperature iq.
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:00:10 -0500
"Jean H. Theoret" wrote:
> This one's got me stumped for a few days now...
>
> How is it possible to control the network interface numbering
> assignment order?
>
> Here's my specific case: the box has 2 on-board Ethernet interfaces
> and a 3rd one on a PCI-Exp
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:30:22 -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
>If you are in great stress over an expected failure mode, you are doing
>something wrong...and it happened long before the NIC failed. Hardware
>fails. Be ready for it. Save stress for unexpected modes of failure
I remember telling this
On 02/03/11 14:14, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:24:55PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
>> problems which are easy to fix. Having worked with similar problems
>> (and their recovery) on other OSs...ick.
>
> talking about other OS's and risking making a fool of myself,
>
On 02/02/2011 11:00 AM, Jean H. Theoret wrote:
> This one's got me stumped for a few days now...
>
> How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment
> order?
>
> Here's my specific case: the box has 2 on-board Ethernet interfaces and
> a 3rd one on a PCI-Express card. Th
hmm, on Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:24:55PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
> problems which are easy to fix. Having worked with similar problems
> (and their recovery) on other OSs...ick.
talking about other OS's and risking making a fool of myself,
what do the others think about the new scheming fedo
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Jean H. Theoret wrote:
> How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment
> order?
The short answer is no. previous discussion:
http://marc.info/?t=12194157011&r=1&w=2
If you are concerned about this, I believe my previous suggestion
On 02/02/11 08:59, Jean H. Theoret wrote:
> This one's got me stumped for a few days now...
>
> How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment
> order?
barely.
> Here's my specific case: the box has 2 on-board Ethernet interfaces and
> a 3rd one on a PCI-Express card.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Jean H. Theoret wrote:
> This one's got me stumped for a few days now...
>
> How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment
order?
>
> Here's my specific case: the box has 2 on-board Ethernet interfaces and
> a 3rd one on a PCI-Express card
This one's got me stumped for a few days now...
How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment order?
Here's my specific case: the box has 2 on-board Ethernet interfaces and
a 3rd one on a PCI-Express card. They come up as:
re0: PCI-Express card
re1: on-board inte
10 matches
Mail list logo