Re: Preempt: apparently no effect on advskew

2010-04-13 Thread william dunand
Marco, Thank you very much for you quick answer. I indeed had the feeling it was not really useful anymore (as the group demotion system is taking care of it) and probably deprecated. I guess I should have checked the latest man page :) Regards, William 2010/4/13 Marco Pfatschbacher : > On Tue,

Re: Preempt: apparently no effect on advskew

2010-04-13 Thread Marco Pfatschbacher
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 04:32:12PM +0900, william dunand wrote: > Dear list, > > I am currently setting up two 4.6 boxed to act as carp'ed firewalls. [...] > Even though I got to quite satisfying results, I am confused about the > net.inet.carp.preempt definition given in the carp(4) man page:

Preempt: apparently no effect on advskew

2010-04-13 Thread william dunand
Dear list, I am currently setting up two 4.6 boxed to act as carp'ed firewalls. - On the active node: % cat /etc/hostname.bge1 inet 10.100.0.1 255.255.255.0 NONE -inet6 % cat hostname.pfsync0 up syncdev bge1 % cat /etc/hostname.bge0 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.48 255.25