Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date ( closed )

2019-03-11 Thread Geir Svalland
On 2019-03-11 16:38, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:34:58AM +, Geir Svalland wrote: >> On 2019-03-11 09:58, Janne Johansson wrote: >>> Den fre 8 mars 2019 kl 20:59 skrev Sean Kamath : > It's a shame good work like this is > of no use anymore. According to my opinio

Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date ( closed )

2019-03-11 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:34:58AM +, Geir Svalland wrote: > > On 2019-03-11 09:58, Janne Johansson wrote: > > Den fre 8 mars 2019 kl 20:59 skrev Sean Kamath : > >>> It's a shame good work like this is > >>> of no use anymore. According to my opinion, it's well written and easy to > >>> follo

Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date ( closed )

2019-03-11 Thread Geir Svalland
On 2019-03-11 09:58, Janne Johansson wrote: > Den fre 8 mars 2019 kl 20:59 skrev Sean Kamath : >>> It's a shame good work like this is >>> of no use anymore. According to my opinion, it's well written and easy to >>> follow. >>> >> So, I’ll take issue with the “well written” part of that. It do

Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date ( closed )

2019-03-11 Thread Janne Johansson
Den fre 8 mars 2019 kl 20:59 skrev Sean Kamath : > > It's a shame good work like this is > > of no use anymore. According to my opinion, it's well written and easy to > > follow. > > > > So, I’ll take issue with the “well written” part of that. It doesn’t do much > in the way of explaining anyth

Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date ( closed )

2019-03-08 Thread Sean Kamath
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 10:38, Geir Svalland wrote: > > It's a shame good work like > this is > of no use anymore. According to my opinion, it's well written and easy > to follow. > > /Hasse So, I’ll take issue with the “well written” part of that. It doesn’t do much in the way of explaining

Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date ( closed )

2019-03-08 Thread Geir Svalland
Thanks to everybody who answered my post. Even those who rose their finger at me for posting this to the list. I've sent a note to Thomas Dwyer with a heads up on this outdated tutorial, and asked if it's possible to get an update. It's a shame good work like this is of no use anymore. According