On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:11:36 +0200
nothingness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using RAIDFrame on OpenBSD since 3.1 and in 4 years I've
> never seen any performance improvement in getting the system to work
> any faster at rebuilding parity after a hard shutdown.
We have us
"Jeff Quast" writes:
> On 10/3/06, Joerg Zinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:11:36 +0200
> > nothingness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've been using RAIDFrame on OpenBSD since 3.1 and in 4 years I've
> > > never seen any performance improvement
On 10/3/06, Joerg Zinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:11:36 +0200
nothingness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using RAIDFrame on OpenBSD since 3.1 and in 4 years I've
> never seen any performance improvement in getting the system to work
> any faster at r
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:11:36 +0200
nothingness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using RAIDFrame on OpenBSD since 3.1 and in 4 years I've
> never seen any performance improvement in getting the system to work
> any faster at rebuilding parity after a hard shutdown. I've tried
>
Hi all,
I've been using RAIDFrame on OpenBSD since 3.1 and in 4 years I've
never seen any performance improvement in getting the system to work any
faster at rebuilding parity after a hard shutdown. I've tried RAID1,
RAID5, SCSI drives, IDE drives, processors from PentiumII 400s to
Athlon64 3200
5 matches
Mail list logo