> i would not be too surprised if the debian folks just passed along in
> their infotext whatever they got told by the upstream (HPA whatever, in this
> case?), so if you wanted to try to see what claimed bugs were fixed, maybe
> chase that source tree down? (good luck?).
I believe the au
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 09:31:01AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
>
> Wow! This was not the impression I got from
>
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/tftp-hpa
>
> which says
>
> -
> HPA's tftp client
>
> This is a tftp client derived from OpenBSD tftp with some extra
> opti
On 3/28/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any plan to support the blksize option in libexec/tftpd?
>
> I am unaware of any. Perhaps the guy who lacks hacked in there will
> reply to you.
>
> > Does anybody else find it strange that tftp-hpa was based on openbsd
> > code, bu
> Is there any plan to support the blksize option in libexec/tftpd?
I am unaware of any. Perhaps the guy who lacks hacked in there will
reply to you.
> Does anybody else find it strange that tftp-hpa was based on openbsd
> code, but no longer compiles on openbsd?
I am not surprised at all.
I l
Is there any plan to support the blksize option in libexec/tftpd?
Does anybody else find it strange that tftp-hpa was based on openbsd
code, but no longer compiles on openbsd?
5 matches
Mail list logo
