On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:10:33 +0700, Ted Unangst
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:40 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
On 18/01/2011, at 11:25 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
My november 21st i386.MP -current handles 1.3Mpps inbound and 1.3Mpps
outbound packet during rootkits attacks on one of our colloca
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:40:59 +0700, David Gwynne wrote:
On 18/01/2011, at 11:25 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
My november 21st i386.MP -current handles 1.3Mpps inbound and 1.3Mpps
outbound packet during rootkits attacks on one of our collocated
costumer, on an 80Mbps traffic, via a vlan inte
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:40 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
> On 18/01/2011, at 11:25 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
>>
>> My november 21st i386.MP -current handles 1.3Mpps inbound and 1.3Mpps
> outbound packet during rootkits attacks on one of our collocated costumer, on
> an 80Mbps traffic, via a vlan inter
On 18/01/2011, at 11:25 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
>
> My november 21st i386.MP -current handles 1.3Mpps inbound and 1.3Mpps
outbound packet during rootkits attacks on one of our collocated costumer, on
an 80Mbps traffic, via a vlan interface. CPU is 1% idle, system still
responsive (I get to ssh-ed
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:51:32 +0700, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:35:02PM -0500, Jason Healy wrote:
I had a few hours to play with a hardware traffic generator today, I
wanted to
try beating up my OpenBSD setup to see what kind of throughput I could
get.
For the curiou
On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> 165kpps is fairly low. Please add a dmesg so there is a chance to see what
> is causing this low rate. Modern HW with good nics should handle around
> 500kpps.
Good to know. Right now we're only on a 45Mbps connection at about 5kpps, so
that se
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:35:02PM -0500, Jason Healy wrote:
> I had a few hours to play with a hardware traffic generator today, I wanted to
> try beating up my OpenBSD setup to see what kind of throughput I could get.
>
> For the curious, I was able to pulverize it with 64 byte packets and it to
On Mon, Jan 17 2011 at 35:23, Jason Healy wrote:
> I had a few hours to play with a hardware traffic generator today, I wanted to
> try beating up my OpenBSD setup to see what kind of throughput I could get.
>
> For the curious, I was able to pulverize it with 64 byte packets and it topped
> out a
8 matches
Mail list logo