On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:43:35 +0100
Florian Obser wrote:
> Yes, quite a lot of effort and money (think travel cost to hackathons)
> was spent by developers between 5.9 and 6.2 releases.
> You are welcome.
Somehow I have the impression that most of the OpenBSD code wasn't
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 09:20:16PM +, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
>
> I had to bypass relayd to roll prod stable.
> Down to apache. Taking care of http and https.
> By redirect.
> Now this setup (if I can call it) is stable.
>
> .
>
> P.S.
> Looks like we have to move forward from here.
Buy
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:33:23PM +, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
>
> 6.2-stable is NOT STABLE.
> Backport, backport,backport.
>
> 6.2-stable is a beta release.
> This is what its IS.
>
> 5.9 vs. 6.2 - last one is a major downwards.
> I know a lot of stuff done in tcp/ip stack and this is a
On 2017/12/21 23:20, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
>
> Fixed in HEAD?! - my ass. Whom puts HEAD into prod?! Not me any more, that's
> for sure.
> IS LIKE DROPPING A TURBO ENGINE INTO A CAR WITH NO WHEELS.
>
> I can dig into this as much as I want/like ON MY OWN TIME.
> But if MONEY are on the
6.2-stable is NOT STABLE.
Backport, backport,backport.
6.2-stable is a beta release.
This is what its IS.
5.9 vs. 6.2 - last one is a major downwards.
I know a lot of stuff done in tcp/ip stack and this is a good job (abt time to
ack SMP), but
Keep those changes in beta, don’t tell ”we have
Fixed in HEAD?! - my ass. Whom puts HEAD into prod?! Not me any more, that's
for sure.
IS LIKE DROPPING A TURBO ENGINE INTO A CAR WITH NO WHEELS.
I can dig into this as much as I want/like ON MY OWN TIME.
But if MONEY are on the table…….
I think I’ll revert to 5.9 all of it.
//mxb
> 21 dec.
Solved?1
What abt OPTIONS in relay_http.c ?
Solved?
Maybe in HEAD.(?)
I have to hand-rolle this in src for 6.2 to have it working.
—> toread=0;
You know.
//mxb
> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 22:40 skrev Janne Johansson :
>
> 2017-12-21 21:58 GMT+01:00 Maxim Bourmistrov
I had to bypass relayd to roll prod stable.
Down to apache. Taking care of http and https.
By redirect.
Now this setup (if I can call it) is stable.
.
P.S.
Looks like we have to move forward from here.
> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 21:58 skrev Maxim Bourmistrov :
>
>
> Sorry,
Sorry, but I have to say
Releases after 5.9 are NOT production stable.
(Until all bugs are smashed within stack changes and SMP unlock).
After 5.9 - cost money and effort.
MONEY.
//mxb
> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 20:29 skrev Maxim Bourmistrov :
>
> Hey,
> After upgrading from
The first node out of two started to respond as soon as second one got reset.
I don’t see any saturation on the network stack.
"Netstat -m” shows 0 for mem denied.
Sysctl -a|grep ifq
or
Sysctl -a|grep drop
Shows 0 as well.
Whole thing looked like a tcp/ip stack hang.
//mxb
> 21 dec. 2017 kl.
10 matches
Mail list logo