Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-25 Thread Marko Cupać
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:43:35 +0100 Florian Obser wrote: > Yes, quite a lot of effort and money (think travel cost to hackathons) > was spent by developers between 5.9 and 6.2 releases. > You are welcome. Somehow I have the impression that most of the OpenBSD code wasn't

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-22 Thread Florian Obser
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 09:20:16PM +, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > > I had to bypass relayd to roll prod stable. > Down to apache. Taking care of http and https. > By redirect. > Now this setup (if I can call it) is stable. > > . > > P.S. > Looks like we have to move forward from here. Buy

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-22 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:33:23PM +, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > > 6.2-stable is NOT STABLE. > Backport, backport,backport. > > 6.2-stable is a beta release. > This is what its IS. > > 5.9 vs. 6.2 - last one is a major downwards. > I know a lot of stuff done in tcp/ip stack and this is a

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/12/21 23:20, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > > Fixed in HEAD?! - my ass. Whom puts HEAD into prod?! Not me any more, that's > for sure. > IS LIKE DROPPING A TURBO ENGINE INTO A CAR WITH NO WHEELS. > > I can dig into this as much as I want/like ON MY OWN TIME. > But if MONEY are on the

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-21 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
6.2-stable is NOT STABLE. Backport, backport,backport. 6.2-stable is a beta release. This is what its IS. 5.9 vs. 6.2 - last one is a major downwards. I know a lot of stuff done in tcp/ip stack and this is a good job (abt time to ack SMP), but Keep those changes in beta, don’t tell ”we have

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-21 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Fixed in HEAD?! - my ass. Whom puts HEAD into prod?! Not me any more, that's for sure. IS LIKE DROPPING A TURBO ENGINE INTO A CAR WITH NO WHEELS. I can dig into this as much as I want/like ON MY OWN TIME. But if MONEY are on the table……. I think I’ll revert to 5.9 all of it. //mxb > 21 dec.

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-21 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Solved?1 What abt OPTIONS in relay_http.c ? Solved? Maybe in HEAD.(?) I have to hand-rolle this in src for 6.2 to have it working. —> toread=0; You know. //mxb > 21 dec. 2017 kl. 22:40 skrev Janne Johansson : > > 2017-12-21 21:58 GMT+01:00 Maxim Bourmistrov

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-21 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
I had to bypass relayd to roll prod stable. Down to apache. Taking care of http and https. By redirect. Now this setup (if I can call it) is stable. . P.S. Looks like we have to move forward from here. > 21 dec. 2017 kl. 21:58 skrev Maxim Bourmistrov : > > > Sorry,

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-21 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
Sorry, but I have to say Releases after 5.9 are NOT production stable. (Until all bugs are smashed within stack changes and SMP unlock). After 5.9 - cost money and effort. MONEY. //mxb > 21 dec. 2017 kl. 20:29 skrev Maxim Bourmistrov : > > Hey, > After upgrading from

Re: OpenBSD 6.2 (up2date with syspatch) - HANGING

2017-12-21 Thread Maxim Bourmistrov
The first node out of two started to respond as soon as second one got reset. I don’t see any saturation on the network stack. "Netstat -m” shows 0 for mem denied. Sysctl -a|grep ifq or Sysctl -a|grep drop Shows 0 as well. Whole thing looked like a tcp/ip stack hang. //mxb > 21 dec. 2017 kl.