On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>
> Linux developers were seeing higher throughput (though obviously higher
> cpu usage) when offload was disabled. Apparently the checksum offload
> can't pipeline. I'm not sure if vlan hw tagging was also implicated.
> IIRC there were more
On 2014-12-02, Darren Tucker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Blaise Hizded wrote:
>>
>> I run the previous generation ALIX 2D13 with OpenBSD 5.6 on it for a
>> home firewall with 10MB WAN broadband and 100MB between computers.
>> All is fine: low temperature, low consumption, same speed
On 02.12.2014 22:25, Stan Gammons wrote:
On 12/02/14 09:51, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Stan Gammons [sg063...@gmail.com] wrote:
The APU1C works fine for a home network. The only 2 things I
dislike are
the CPU temperature and the link LED's are off when the Ethernet
ports are
linked at 1 gig. I've
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:54:14AM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Blaise Hizded wrote:
> >
> > I run the previous generation ALIX 2D13 with OpenBSD 5.6 on it for a
> > home firewall with 10MB WAN broadband and 100MB between computers.
> > All is fine: low temperatur
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Blaise Hizded wrote:
>
> I run the previous generation ALIX 2D13 with OpenBSD 5.6 on it for a
> home firewall with 10MB WAN broadband and 100MB between computers.
> All is fine: low temperature, low consumption, same speed as with a
> basic 100MBB switch.
>
I spen
On 12/02/14 09:51, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Stan Gammons [sg063...@gmail.com] wrote:
The APU1C works fine for a home network. The only 2 things I dislike are
the CPU temperature and the link LED's are off when the Ethernet ports are
linked at 1 gig. I've complained about the link LED issue on the
li...@ggp2.com [li...@ggp2.com] wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:51:19AM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Stan Gammons [sg063...@gmail.com] wrote:
> > Call me crazy, but when OpenBSD takes over control of the Realtek chips,
> > isn't it OpenBSD's responsibility to program them properly, not the
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:51:19AM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Stan Gammons [sg063...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Call me crazy, but when OpenBSD takes over control of the Realtek chips,
> isn't it OpenBSD's responsibility to program them properly, not the BIOS?
Wouldn't this generally be controlled b
Stan Gammons [sg063...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> The APU1C works fine for a home network. The only 2 things I dislike are
> the CPU temperature and the link LED's are off when the Ethernet ports are
> linked at 1 gig. I've complained about the link LED issue on the PC Engines
> support forum, but I g
On 11/28/2014 06:21 PM, trondd wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Edgar Pettijohn
> wrote:
>
>> This is something I've been interested in trying, but I would want it as a
>> wireless access point as well and not sure what cards are supported and
>> work well. Does anyone know of any good
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Edgar Pettijohn
wrote:
>
> This is something I've been interested in trying, but I would want it as a
> wireless access point as well and not sure what cards are supported and
> work well. Does anyone know of any good choices?
>
>
I went with an athn card in my
On 11/28/14 01:32, Blaise Hizded wrote:
On 11/28/2014 06:01 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
On 11/27/14 23:50, jungle Boogie wrote:
Hi,
On 27 November 2014 at 20:38, wrote:
you can just use old hardware for these purposes.
from the man who literally wrote the book on pf (from pf tutorial via
http://h
On 11/28/2014 06:01 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 11/27/14 23:50, jungle Boogie wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On 27 November 2014 at 20:38, wrote:
>>>
>>> you can just use old hardware for these purposes.
>>>
>>> from the man who literally wrote the book on pf (from pf tutorial via
>>> http://home.nuug.no/~peter
I only have ADSL with downloads < 23Mb/s. A PC Engines ALIX does just fine
for my pf.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:25 PM, jungle Boogie
wrote:
> Hi Stan,
> On 27 November 2014 at 20:09, Stan Gammons wrote:
> >
> > The latest BIOS, 9/8/2014, doesn't fix the LED issue.
> >
> > I saw Brad's comments
Hi Brad,
On 27 November 2014 at 21:01, Brad Smith wrote:
>
> I don't see anyone claiming it would not be good. It's more like if you
> happen to have some old hw around that it would probably be good enough
> for what you're describing but the APU system would also do the job just
> fine.
>
>
Fai
On 11/27/14 23:50, jungle Boogie wrote:
Hi,
On 27 November 2014 at 20:38, wrote:
you can just use old hardware for these purposes.
from the man who literally wrote the book on pf (from pf tutorial via
http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/long-firewall.html):
I have not seen comparable tests
On Nov 27, 2014, at 9:35 PM, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hello All,
> On 25 November 2014 at 12:52, Motty Cruz wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I am searching for hardware to build a router with OpenBSD. I have found
>> mixed signals as to fastest system with i386 or 64bit. I know in the past
>> i386 OpenBSD u
Hi,
On 27 November 2014 at 20:38, wrote:
>
> you can just use old hardware for these purposes.
>
> from the man who literally wrote the book on pf (from pf tutorial via
> http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/long-firewall.html):
>
> I have not seen comparable tests performed recently [3.1 era], but
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 20:10:14 -0800 jungle Boogie
wrote:
> Hi Brad,
> On 27 November 2014 at 19:51, Brad Smith wrote:
> > On 11/27/14 22:35, jungle Boogie wrote:
> >> Anyone have any objections? I know the NICs are not intel so that will
> >> probably get a strike against it, but I like the low p
Hi Stan,
On 27 November 2014 at 20:09, Stan Gammons wrote:
>
> The latest BIOS, 9/8/2014, doesn't fix the LED issue.
>
> I saw Brad's comments in the other email. The APU is Ok to use as a home
> firewall. I have no experience on using one in more demanding environment.
>
>
Well what would be som
On 11/27/14 22:01, jungle Boogie wrote:
Hi Stan,
On 27 November 2014 at 19:49, Stan Gammons wrote:
On 11/27/14 21:35, jungle Boogie wrote:
Anyone have any objections? I know the NICs are not intel so that will
probably get a strike against it, but I like the low power.
I have a couple of th
Hi Brad,
On 27 November 2014 at 19:51, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 11/27/14 22:35, jungle Boogie wrote:
>> Anyone have any objections? I know the NICs are not intel so that will
>> probably get a strike against it, but I like the low power.
>
>
> Unless you guys give some sort of hints as to what these
Hi Stan,
On 27 November 2014 at 19:49, Stan Gammons wrote:
> On 11/27/14 21:35, jungle Boogie wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have any objections? I know the NICs are not intel so that will
>> probably get a strike against it, but I like the low power.
>>
>>
>
> I have a couple of the APU1C's and they are Ok.
On 11/27/14 22:35, jungle Boogie wrote:
Hello All,
On 25 November 2014 at 12:52, Motty Cruz wrote:
Hello all,
I am searching for hardware to build a router with OpenBSD. I have found
mixed signals as to fastest system with i386 or 64bit. I know in the past
i386 OpenBSD used to perform a lot bet
On 11/27/14 21:35, jungle Boogie wrote:
Hello All,
On 25 November 2014 at 12:52, Motty Cruz wrote:
Hello all,
I am searching for hardware to build a router with OpenBSD. I have found
mixed signals as to fastest system with i386 or 64bit. I know in the past
i386 OpenBSD used to perform a lot bet
Hello All,
On 25 November 2014 at 12:52, Motty Cruz wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am searching for hardware to build a router with OpenBSD. I have found
> mixed signals as to fastest system with i386 or 64bit. I know in the past
> i386 OpenBSD used to perform a lot better than 64bit system.
>
I'm in si
On 14-11-25 02:52 PM, Motty Cruz wrote:
Hello all,
I am searching for hardware to build a router with OpenBSD. I have
found mixed signals as to fastest system with i386 or 64bit. I know in
the past i386 OpenBSD used to perform a lot better than 64bit system.
Any suggestions!
Thanks,
Motty
On 11/25/14 15:51, Motty Cruz wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am searching for hardware to build a router with OpenBSD. I have found
> mixed signals as to fastest system with i386 or 64bit. I know in the
> past i386 OpenBSD used to perform a lot better than 64bit system.
Paraphrasing your question:
I'm
Thank you Brad.
Juan J. Fernandez
On 11/25/14 21:20, Brad Smith wrote:
On 11/25/14 18:18, motty cruz wrote:
Thank you Juan,
I appreciate your suggestions and advice.
I am planning on using Dual socket B2 (LGA 1356) supports Intel® Xeon®
processor E5-2400 v2, I suppose i386 would perform b
Thank you for your advice Philip.
Can you please give your advice then ?
Thank you :)
Juan J. Fernandez
On 11/25/14 21:06, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Juan J. Fernandez
wrote:
In general, you could achieve performance by configuring your kernel
according to your
On 11/25/14 18:18, motty cruz wrote:
Thank you Juan,
I appreciate your suggestions and advice.
I am planning on using Dual socket B2 (LGA 1356) supports Intel® Xeon®
processor E5-2400 v2, I suppose i386 would perform better rather than 64bit
amd processor. Thank you again!
The amd64 arch r
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Juan J. Fernandez
wrote:
> In general, you could achieve performance by configuring your kernel
> according to your hardware. You can use dmesg(8) and 'GENERIC' kernel
> configuration as a guide for your hardware.
That's bad advice. When you run a non-standard ke
Thank you Juan,
I appreciate your suggestions and advice.
I am planning on using Dual socket B2 (LGA 1356) supports Intel® Xeon®
processor E5-2400 v2, I suppose i386 would perform better rather than 64bit
amd processor. Thank you again!
Thanks,
Motty
On 11/25/2014 03:01 PM, Juan J. Fernandez w
Greetings Motty Cruz,
In general, you could achieve performance by configuring your kernel
according to your hardware. You can use dmesg(8) and 'GENERIC' kernel
configuration as a guide for your hardware.
Sometimes i386 will run faster than 64 bit (see
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html).
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Motty Cruz wrote:
> I am searching for hardware to build a router with OpenBSD. I have found
> mixed signals as to fastest system with i386 or 64bit. I know in the past
> i386 OpenBSD used to perform a lot better than 64bit system.
As I understand it, amd64 has be
35 matches
Mail list logo
