On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 10:09:31PM +0100, Polarian wrote:
> I do have one question, if anyone is willing to answer it, so I have on and
> off specified "keep state" depending on when I wrote the rule, but the
> following specifies it is the default:
> https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html
>
>
On 7/25/23 16:55, Polarian wrote:
Also, I didn't choose OpenBSD cause it was easy, I choose it for
security, if I slapped OpenWrt I could be done in seconds, but I want to
learn and I want to use OpenBSD for security, even at the hit of
performance, so I don't care about the complexity, only to k
>> It can be done, but 1) it means that it's possible for hosts on RFC1918
>> addresses to reach the routable addresses directly without going via the
>> router and vice-versa (which may or may not be a problem), 2) you'll
>> need to think about how you want to arrange things if you use DHCP, and
>
On 2023-07-25, Zack Newman wrote:
> On 7/25/23 06:03, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> 217.169.18.56 is a network address (mask it out against the netmask,
>> the remaining "host bits" are all zeroes), you cannot use this (or the
>> broadcast address) as a host address
>
> I am sure you were not trying
An individual was kind enough to reach out and inform me that they
believe I should have not said "I am sure you were not trying to be
'technical'..." but instead "I am sure you were trying not to be
'technical'..." as the former sounded like I was suggesting Stuart was
giving bad advice by being
On 7/25/23 06:03, Stuart Henderson wrote:
217.169.18.56 is a network address (mask it out against the netmask,
the remaining "host bits" are all zeroes), you cannot use this (or the
broadcast address) as a host address
I am sure you were not trying to be "technical"; but for people that
don't a
6 matches
Mail list logo
