On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:45 AM, John D. Verne j...@clevermonkey.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:28:24AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2014-04-28, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-04-28, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have
to reload each time
configure things for unbound-control, then you can do
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:28:24AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2014-04-28, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have
to reload each
On 2014-04-28, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have
to reload each time
configure things for unbound-control, then you can do
unbond-control local_data somehost.exaple.com A 192.0.2.1.
Dear misc readers,
Currently i am using dnsmasq because it inserts in the dns cache the
hostname sended to the dhcp server it provides.
It's neat, and well done by dnsmasq.
But it is not in base, moreover DNSSEC support is relying on some new
crypto lib, and some features ( static route did
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:53, sven falempin wrote:
Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have
to reload each time, so to resolve the LAN clients hostnames i would
need to
- trigger a script when a lease is given (mostly depends the backend
of the dhcp server)
-
6 matches
Mail list logo
