On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:14:50PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/03/24 14:12, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
...on Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:22:37PM +0100, Anthony Howe wrote:
P gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/libsm/refill.c
P
On Friday, 24 March 2006 at 14:12:44 +0100, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
Replacing OpenBSDs sendmail with sendmail.org's version
is a non-issue (as in just works) on any OpenBSD version
which ships = 8.12.
Do you mind to share the instruction of how to replace OpenBSD's
sendmail with
Zoong PHAM wrote:
Do you mind to share the instruction of how to replace OpenBSD's
sendmail with sendmail.org's 8.13.6?
Just forget about that administration nightmare and go either -stable or
-current. Not sure whether this warrants and errata entry (too much hype
for my taste), but if it
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 14:14 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The patch is in 3.8-stable now, and -current has 8.13.6, so
people following either of these just need to update.
I run sendmail under systrace (OpenBSD 3.8) and a couple of weeks ago
(sometime after the exploit was initially
Claus Assmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
All I know, sendmail.org says I can not patch versions below
8.13.5:
That's wrong. See the 8.13.6 note:
and 8.12 are availabe at our FTP site. However, note that those
patches do not (cleanly) apply to versions
...on Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:22:37PM +0100, Anthony Howe wrote:
I installed 8.13.6 last night from the source tar ball on two machines
(one is OpenBSD 3.6, the other an old Linux box). Appears to be chugging
along happily. Can't speak to the specific security issue though.
Replacing
On 2006/03/24 14:12, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
...on Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:22:37PM +0100, Anthony Howe wrote:
I installed 8.13.6 last night from the source tar ball on two machines
(one is OpenBSD 3.6, the other an old Linux box). Appears to be chugging
along happily. Can't speak
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:14:50PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/03/24 14:12, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
...on Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:22:37PM +0100, Anthony Howe wrote:
I installed 8.13.6 last night from the source tar ball on two machines
(one is OpenBSD 3.6, the other an
On 2006-03-24 17:10:27 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:14:50PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The patch is in 3.8-stable now, and -current has 8.13.6, so
people following either of these just need to update.
I am pretty certain a fix was imported for 3.7-stable,
Raul Aldaz wrote:
Any comment about this? (see sendmail.org).
All I know, sendmail.org says I can not patch versions below
8.13.5:
If you cannot upgrade to 8.13.6, then you can apply a patch
to 8.13.5, or a patch for 8.12.11. Note: these patches do not
apply cleanly to older versions;
Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
Raul Aldaz wrote:
Any comment about this? (see sendmail.org).
So fix is currently unknown for 3.8-stable with 8.13.4. Looks
like we need to wait millert@'s work for stable branches...
One way to fix 3.8-stable is to pull in 8.13.6 entirely but
anyway it needs
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
All I know, sendmail.org says I can not patch versions below
8.13.5:
That's wrong. See the 8.13.6 note:
and 8.12 are availabe at our FTP site. However, note that those
patches do not (cleanly) apply to versions other than 8.13.5 and
Hi,
Any comment about this? (see sendmail.org).
Este correo electrsnico y la informacisn contenida en el mismo es de
caracter confidencial y esta sometida al secreto profesional, dirigiindose
exclusivamente al destinatario mencionado en el encabezamiento, cuyos datos
forman parte de un
13 matches
Mail list logo
