> Not sure what your environment is, but I'm a big fan of sshfs for light
> usage.
>
Zero config and fast enough for light usage, sshfs is pretty cool.
We used SMB locally: the server was on macos, the clients on macos, windows and
linux. The problem with file permissions on macos had solution in the windows
registry, but windows had a mind of its own and kept changing itself. A robust
solution was to move the server to linux and enforce file p
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:17:22 +0100
> If you get motivated, there's probably some "mount this sftp server
> as a drive" software for windows, and then you can get rid of Samba.
> But I've never looked for such a thing.
These tend to be pay for and you may need to run ntfs as I found some
inconsis
On 02/15/2018 12:03 AM, Martin Hanson wrote:
How do you share files between OpenBSD, Linux, and Windows boxes?
[...]
How do you manage file sharing between these systems (if it all)?
Not sure what your environment is, but I'm a big fan of sshfs for light
usage.
Then you can view Samba as a s
How do you share files between OpenBSD, Linux, and Windows boxes?
Currently I have a setup in which I mount Samba shares that are being served
from Linux boxes and mounted on Linux boxes using cifs and on Windows boxes.
This works very well and it's both easy to administer and it's very fast.
I
5 matches
Mail list logo