On 3/13/06, Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you don't mind me chiming in, my disks arn't nearly as slow, but I
> expected them to be faster. Can anybody make a recommendation to
> improve my disk i/o, or confirm the speeds I get are about right? This
> is the first machine I've had thats
If you don't mind me chiming in, my disks arn't nearly as slow, but I
expected them to be faster. Can anybody make a recommendation to
improve my disk i/o, or confirm the speeds I get are about right? This
is the first machine I've had thats U320 SCSI-capable.
raid0 is a mirror of two scsi disks:
Raidframe works great, no problems (for me) :)
Adam Papai wrote:
Srebrenko Sehic said:
You're lucky that your RAID1 array even works, since integrated
mirroring (IM) is currently not supported by mpt(4) driver. If it
works, it is slow like hell.
If you want speed, remove the RAID1 array and r
Srebrenko Sehic said:
> You're lucky that your RAID1 array even works, since integrated
> mirroring (IM) is currently not supported by mpt(4) driver. If it
> works, it is slow like hell.
>
> If you want speed, remove the RAID1 array and run with 2 normal disks.
>
> On 3/13/06, Adam Papai <[EMAIL PR
You're lucky that your RAID1 array even works, since integrated
mirroring (IM) is currently not supported by mpt(4) driver. If it
works, it is slow like hell.
If you want speed, remove the RAID1 array and run with 2 normal disks.
On 3/13/06, Adam Papai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> I'
Hi misc,
I've got a problem with the SCSI read/write speed under 3.8.
It has LSILOGIC HW raid adapter running raid1.
The time dd test shows:
astatine[wooh]> time dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/wooh/output bs=1m count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes transferred in 411.637 sec
6 matches
Mail list logo