On 2016-09-02, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 09/03/16 00:46, Aioi Yuuko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to wean myself off external packages as much as possible. Is
>> there a common, accepted way of viewing, for instance, battery life, with
>> only included
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Aioi Yuuko wrote:
> Sorry, I was vague in my original email: What I meant was, I'm aware that
> there are ways of getting it off the command line; I'm mostly curious about
> getting it on my desktop so it's easy to glance at. Would my best bet be
>
Sorry, I was vague in my original email: What I meant was, I'm aware that there
are ways of getting it off the command line; I'm mostly curious about getting
it on my desktop so it's easy to glance at. Would my best bet be running a
script like that in a particular xterm, and marking that xterm
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:46:27PM BST, Aioi Yuuko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to wean myself off external packages as much as possible.
> Is there a common, accepted way of viewing, for instance, battery
> life, with only included programs?
Hi Aioi,
There's the already mentioned apm(8) (i.e.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Aioi Yuuko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to wean myself off external packages as much as possible. Is
> there a common, accepted way of viewing, for instance, battery life, with
> only included programs?
>
>
Possibly with sysctl taking a look at the
On 09/03/16 00:46, Aioi Yuuko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to wean myself off external packages as much as possible. Is there
> a common, accepted way of viewing, for instance, battery life, with only
> included programs?
>
It depends upon your precise needs, but you could look into
Hi,
I'm trying to wean myself off external packages as much as possible. Is there a
common, accepted way of viewing, for instance, battery life, with only included
programs?
7 matches
Mail list logo