Re: T1 and DSL failover? redundancy?

2006-06-24 Thread Marcos Marconcini
time. Marcos Marconcini Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:35:37 -0300 From: Giancarlo Razzolini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: T1 and DSL failover? redundancy? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I do have a similar setup, but in my case, i have two ADSL routers

Re: T1 and DSL failover? redundancy?

2006-06-23 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
John Brahy wrote: I was hoping to get some suggestions on the best way to handle this. We just put a DSL line for inet backup and I'd like to have it automagically failover. We are running OpenBSD 3.9 -stable on a box with four interfaces. Currently we have one interface connected to our

Re: T1 and DSL failover? redundancy?

2006-06-22 Thread Lawrence Horvath
You can use SNMP to monitor the wan interface on almost all routers, (I know personally about the cisco), so you might set something up that monitors taht, or you could using a dynamic routing protcocal, even rip would do, just something interactive between OBSD firewall and the router, the

Re: T1 and DSL failover? redundancy?

2006-06-22 Thread L. V. Lammert
At 11:13 PM 6/21/2006 -0700, Lawrence Horvath wrote: You can use SNMP to monitor the wan interface on almost all routers, (I know personally about the cisco), so you might set something up that monitors taht, or you could using a dynamic routing protcocal, even rip would do, just something

Re: T1 and DSL failover? redundancy?

2006-06-22 Thread Lawrence Horvath
On 6/22/06, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11:13 PM 6/21/2006 -0700, Lawrence Horvath wrote: You can use SNMP to monitor the wan interface on almost all routers, (I know personally about the cisco), so you might set something up that monitors taht, or you could using a dynamic routing

Re: T1 and DSL failover? redundancy?

2006-06-22 Thread Steven Surdock
Lawrence Horvath wrote: On 6/22/06, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11:13 PM 6/21/2006 -0700, Lawrence Horvath wrote: ... Keep in mind also that redundancy is fine for outgoing traffic, but to actually route incoming traffic you must also have an upstream ISP(s) that can handle

T1 and DSL failover? redundancy?

2006-06-21 Thread John Brahy
I was hoping to get some suggestions on the best way to handle this. We just put a DSL line for inet backup and I'd like to have it automagically failover. We are running OpenBSD 3.9 -stable on a box with four interfaces. Currently we have one interface connected to our private network and one

Re: T1 and DSL failover? redundancy?

2006-06-21 Thread NetNeanderthal
On 6/21/06, John Brahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are my other options? I'd like to have it automatically fail over but I'm not sure what is required to do that. Have you considered using a WAN card for your T1 natively on OpenBSD? As well, you might have a look at ifstated(8) if that's the