On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:31:15PM +0200, ropers wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> >> If other BSDs worked this way, they would have been
> >> successful in attracting a larger userbase. They
> >> have the means to do it with their larger developer
> >> commu
Why not ? Sure it's easier to control a group if it's small.
You can also delegate authority to experienced people
for different areas. This is currently done in openbsd.
The BSD community is very small compared to Linux. As an example,
in Mauritius, there are 2 BSD users (Mac OS X doesn't count
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:42:53AM -0500, Matthew Weigel wrote:
> On 8/28/2011 10:50 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> >> (and main link which caused that
> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html)
> >
> > T
On 8/28/2011 10:50 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> (and main link which caused that
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html)
>
> This link makes me a little sad. I don't quite get why that guy mentions
> th
Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 01:13:14PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 August 2011 19:50:51 Marc Espie wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > > > (and main link which caused that
> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-a
Yep. And all of this speech is political nonsense for my, as only
politic I'm concerned is about licenses.
Worried about your take over the world plans? Who cares...
I do this for fun, earn some pennies when possible, and keep going! You
all can go mess with whatever you're up to. I alone woul
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 01:13:14PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> On Sunday 28 August 2011 19:50:51 Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > > (and main link which caused that
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.h
> >
On Sunday 28 August 2011 19:50:51 Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > (and main link which caused that
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.h
> >tml)
>
> This link makes me a little sad. I don't quite get why that g
On 8/28/2011 1:01 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Loganaden Velvindronwrote:
If other BSDs worked this way, they would have been
successful in attracting a larger userbase. They
have the means to do it with the
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0500, J Sisson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Loganaden Velvindron
> wrote:
>
> > If other BSDs worked this way, they would have been
> > successful in attracting a larger userbase. They
> > have the means to do it with their larger developer
> > com
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> If other BSDs worked this way, they would have been
> successful in attracting a larger userbase. They
> have the means to do it with their larger developer
> community.
>
> This begs the question of whether or not their developer comm
I have a slightly different view on this.
I think that the other BSDs have a fundamental
development problem: -current is often broken.
If I notice a bug in release, I can grab a snapshot
and download the source and write a fix. This
is something difficult to do with other BSDs.
Also, the system
>> (and main link which caused that
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html)
>
> This link makes me a little sad. I don't quite get why that guy mentions
> that FreeBSD ports has problems, but then mentions only the netbsd work,
> and blatantly ignores our tools,
On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after reading this thread
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2011/08/22/msg008819.html
> (and main link which caused that
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html)
> I must really say thanks a
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> (and main link which caused that
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html)
>
> This link makes me a little sad. I don't quite get why that guy men
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Bryan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:00, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> after reading this thread
>> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2011/08/22/msg008819.html
>> (and main link which caused that
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ar
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:00:46PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> (and main link which caused that
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html)
This link makes me a little sad. I don't quite get why that guy mentions
that FreeBSD ports has problems, but then mentions on
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:00, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after reading this thread
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2011/08/22/msg008819.html
> (and main link which caused that
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html)
> I must really say thanks
Hi all,
after reading this thread
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2011/08/22/msg008819.html
(and main link which caused that
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html)
I must really say thanks a lot for your SUPERB job in development of
such a great OS which
19 matches
Mail list logo
