I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)
I often have cause to use date -r to show me what the date stamp is
in human terms.
It is usually in spamd or on some documents I get that are time stamped
using the seconds since the epoc.
Now I have a need to generate some timestamps of my own
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
| Cluebat?
date +%s
--
[++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
+++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)
I often have cause to use date -r to show me what the date stamp is
in human terms.
It is usually in spamd or on some documents I get that are time stamped
using the seconds
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:55:37AM +1300, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
| On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
| I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)
|
| I often have cause to use date -r to show me what the date stamp is
| in human terms.
| It is usually
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 23:47:32 +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
| Cluebat?
date +%s
Ah yes. Reading the date man page won't do one any good unless you
follow the pointer to strftime.
Thanks for the wakeup which was the result of looking at
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:55:37 +1300, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)
I often have cause to use date -r to show me what the date stamp is
in human terms.
It is usually in spamd or on some
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012, at 09:49 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:55:37 +1300, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:43AM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
I think I'm suffering from OldTimers Disease ;-)
I often have cause to use date -r to show me what the date
7 matches
Mail list logo
