Hello,
I didn't see any mention of changes to UFS2 support in 4.3:
http://www.openbsd.org/43.html#new
Will it still require a kernel recompilation to use?
Perhaps no? http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/conf/GENERIC?v=OPENBSD
Is it bootable?
Thanks,
Michael.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 08:13:00PM +0200, Michael Dexter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I didn't see any mention of changes to UFS2 support in 4.3:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/43.html#new
>
> Will it still require a kernel recompilation to use?
4.2 and 4.3 have ffs2 support. No recompilation needed, whic
Hello,
I think Michael meant UFS, as in what FreeBSD uses. I too would like
to know the status on this, as I have a FreeBSD machine that could
become an OpenBSD machine :)
Kind regards,
Timothy
On 16/03/2008, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 08:13:00PM +0200, Mi
Timothy Wilson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think Michael meant UFS, as in what FreeBSD uses. I too would like
> to know the status on this, as I have a FreeBSD machine that could
> become an OpenBSD machine :)
>
> Kind regards,
They are the same thing, "FFS" is an acronym for Berkeley's "Fast
Ah my mistake. I have to specify either 44bsd or ufs2 when I mount BSD
partitions in Linux, so I thought they were different.
On 15 Mar 2008 21:37:45 -0700, Unix Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Timothy Wilson wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > I think Michael meant UFS, as in what FreeBSD uses. I t
On 15 Mar 2008 21:37:45 -0700, Unix Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They are the same thing, "FFS" is an acronym for Berkeley's "Fast File
> System" - which is a decedent of AT&T UFS (Unix File System).
>
> I agree, the naming conventions between the BSD's are unique... but see
> the following
Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
On 15 Mar 2008 21:37:45 -0700, Unix Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
They are the same thing, "FFS" is an acronym for Berkeley's "Fast File
System" - which is a decedent of AT&T UFS (Unix File System).
I agree, the naming conventions between the BSD's are unique... but
7 matches
Mail list logo