Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-07-13 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 13 July 2012 15:16, David Coppa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Coppa wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-07-13 Thread David Coppa
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Coppa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: >>> This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that >>> rtorrent won't run correctly, right? >> >> I beli

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-07-13 Thread David Coppa
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: >> This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that >> rtorrent won't run correctly, right? > > I believe the problem didn't exhibit with uthreads. It's only wit

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-07-13 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 13 July 2012 14:42, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that > rtorrent won't run correctly, right? > Or is there any backport? > Thanks > Can you give it a spin ? 5.1 uses uthreads still, this problem might appear more often with rthreads,

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-07-13 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that > rtorrent won't run correctly, right? I believe the problem didn't exhibit with uthreads. It's only with the switch to rthreads that it became a problem. Philip Guen

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-07-13 Thread David Coppa
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that > rtorrent won't run correctly, right? > Or is there any backport? Nope. 5.1 has 0.12.9/0.8.9 (and 5.2 will have the same, since I'm going to rollback from 0.13.2/0.9.2

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-07-13 Thread Paolo Aglialoro
This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that rtorrent won't run correctly, right? Or is there any backport? Thanks On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:31 PM, David Coppa wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:21:06AM +

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-07-12 Thread David Coppa
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:21:06AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: >> >> Can you check if the old 0.12.9/0.8.9 exposes the same symptoms on >> recent -current? > > Sorry, but really missed this. > >> I'm thinking about backing out the update to

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-07-12 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:21:06AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > > Can you check if the old 0.12.9/0.8.9 exposes the same symptoms on > recent -current? Sorry, but really missed this. > I'm thinking about backing out the update to 0.13.2/0.9.2... This solves the problem for amd64. Thank you.

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-06-15 Thread David Coppa
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: >> >> Yes, this is something I've also noticed. >> No, I don't know how to patch it up. >> In other words, please be my guest and help me in trying to debug this >> problem... >

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-06-01 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > > Yes, this is something I've also noticed. > No, I don't know how to patch it up. > In other words, please be my guest and help me in trying to debug this > problem... OK, will try to make some tests this weekend. Thank you.

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-06-01 Thread David Coppa
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > Hi misc@, > > Running the latest snapshot, there are some issues I'm facing when I run > rtorrent + ~5 downloads. > > The system becomes VERY unresponsive, varying between 5 seconds of activity > and 10 seconds locked. Yes, this is someth

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-05-31 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:15:19PM +1000, Brett wrote: > > I don't have a solution, except to only run the amount of torrents your > machine can handle (5 or 6 is ok for my computer). Since rtorrent is normally > very lightweight it should be able to cope with a lot more than it currently > can.

Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-05-31 Thread Brett
On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:47:31 -0300 Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > Hi misc@, > > Running the latest snapshot, there are some issues I'm facing when I run > rtorrent + ~5 downloads. > > The system becomes VERY unresponsive, varying between 5 seconds of activity > and 10 seconds locked. > > Before th

Unresponsive -current + rtorrent

2012-05-31 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
Hi misc@, Running the latest snapshot, there are some issues I'm facing when I run rtorrent + ~5 downloads. The system becomes VERY unresponsive, varying between 5 seconds of activity and 10 seconds locked. Before this, had 2 complete locks, and did a cold reboot. No serial to try something, nor