Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Ross Cameron
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote: > At 03:27 PM 10/7/2009 +0100, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: > >> From: "L. V. Lammert" >>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: >>> >>> It's VirtualBox - looks like it's still crap. VMWare works fine, so does qemu. >>>

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread L. V. Lammert
At 03:27 PM 10/7/2009 +0100, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: From: "L. V. Lammert" On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: It's VirtualBox - looks like it's still crap. VMWare works fine, so does qemu. As does VirtualBox with proper hardware support (AMD64 Socket AM2), .. though we do

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Is it that VirtualBox isn't emulating x86 hardware properly? Or, is it > a bug in obsd? (I am thinking the former). Any Ideas/suggestion are > entertained (Trying in VMware right now) Yes, Virtualbox is not emulating a PC correctly.

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Kay - Syllopsium
From: "L. V. Lammert" On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: It's VirtualBox - looks like it's still crap. VMWare works fine, so does qemu. As does VirtualBox with proper hardware support (AMD64 Socket AM2), .. though we do not use X on VMx. Are you seriously saying VirtualBox is a

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Christiano Farina Haesbaert
2009/10/7 Ishwor Gurung : > Hi guys, > (Pardon since lot of people use *BSD and Linux together but if rude, > I'll take it off-list) > Ok. It installs fine. > However, I keep getting segfaults on simple programs (such as xorgconfig). > (I don't have exact text/dmesg to dump right now but I can prod

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread L. V. Lammert
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: > It's VirtualBox - looks like it's still crap. VMWare works fine, so does > qemu. > As does VirtualBox with proper hardware support (AMD64 Socket AM2), .. though we do not use X on VMx. Lee

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Ishwor Gurung
[...] > rig's cpu has VT-x. s/has/supports -- Regards, Ishwor Gurung

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Ishwor Gurung
Folks, Hi. Thanks for replying. > First, get VirtualBox 3.0.8. Your version is ancient. Yep I figured after posting. I will do that when I have some time(but not for some time now[see below]). > Run it on a machine that has either Intel VT-x or AMD-V. Make a new vm > host and make sure the VT-X o

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Joel Dinel
> Is it that VirtualBox isn't emulating x86 hardware properly? Or, is it > a bug in obsd? (I am thinking the former). Any Ideas/suggestion are > entertained (Trying in VMware right now) First, get VirtualBox 3.0.8. Your version is ancient. Run it on a machine that has either Intel VT-x or AMD-V.

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Kay - Syllopsium
Hi guys, (Pardon since lot of people use *BSD and Linux together but if rude, I'll take it off-list) Ok. It installs fine. However, I keep getting segfaults on simple programs (such as xorgconfig). (I don't have exact text/dmesg to dump right now but I can produce it if required) Is it that Virtu

VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Ishwor Gurung
Hi guys, (Pardon since lot of people use *BSD and Linux together but if rude, I'll take it off-list) Ok. It installs fine. However, I keep getting segfaults on simple programs (such as xorgconfig). (I don't have exact text/dmesg to dump right now but I can produce it if required) Is it that Virtua