load CPU and
database or another servers lost speed in disk operations.
In Linux (test on 2.6.35 libre) renice work correct...
Why renice not work in OpenBSD?
--
Dmitry Telegin
I have to admit that I was in the middle of a problem when I looked at
this, and got the wrong end
hmm, on Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 07:12:57AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt said that
use linux, you are clearly a moron, it will suit you better.
your civility on this mailing list is decreasing by the day.
it was much better when you started. perhaps now you feel
you earned some right to call people
On 10/12/10 07:54, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 07:12:57AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt said that
use linux, you are clearly a moron, it will suit you better.
your civility on this mailing list is decreasing by the day.
it was much better when you started. perhaps now you
hmm, on Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:33:55AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt said that
trolls abound on this list, you can count yourself amongst their
numbers. why not harass any of the other people who, like me, were
rightly critical of dmitry? you do it because you are a troll.
i know, asking for a bit
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:45:39PM +0400, Dmitry-T wrote:
11.10.10, 12:13, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
You try to renice I/O bound
processes. The scheduler priority only matters when processes are CPU
bound.
Yes of course, but... all my dd processes use CPU.
12.10.10, 20:46, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:45:39PM +0400, Dmitry-T wrote:
11.10.10, 12:13, Claudio Jeker :
You try to renice I/O bound
processes. The scheduler priority only matters when processes are CPU
bound.
Yes
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Dmitry-T dmitr...@yandex.ru wrote:
Have OpenBSD non-preemptible kernel code?
OpenBSD kernel code running in process context (i.e., kernel threads
and user processes running system calls) cannot preempt one another.
However, interrupts may preempt processes or
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Dmitry-T dmitr...@yandex.ru wrote:
Have OpenBSD non-preemptible kernel code?
OpenBSD kernel code running in process context (i.e., kernel threads
and user processes running system
13.10.10, 00:27, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Dmitry-T wrote:
Have OpenBSD non-preemptible kernel code?
OpenBSD kernel code running in process context (i.e., kernel threads
and user processes running system calls) cannot preempt one another.
11.10.10, 08:46, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com:
1) BSDanywhere is not OpenBSD
http://bsdanywhere.org/faq
What is the primary focus of BSDanywhere?
A mostly __unmodified__ OpenBSD kernel and userland
My test very simple, please test your system.
Is your original OpenBSD show
11.10.10, 00:19, Martin SchrC6der mar...@oneiros.de:
2010/10/10 Dmitry-T :
load from livecd bsdanywhere46-amd64
Then go to http://bsdanywhere.org/mailinglists and complain there.
My test very simple, please test your system.
Is your original OpenBSD show identical results?
--
Dmitry
11.10.10, 08:46, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com:
6) Did you test it on real OpenBSD, real HW and latest release or snapshot?
I'm search stable and secure OS.
I'm test: my work Mac OS X 10.6.3, FreeBSD 8.1 on livecd
frenzy-1.3-ju-release-rus, my home Linux Debian - renice work more
and
database or another servers lost speed in disk operations.
In Linux (test on 2.6.35 libre) renice work correct...
Why renice not work in OpenBSD?
This is not how scheduling priorities work. You try to renice I/O bound
processes. The scheduler priority only matters when processes are CPU
11.10.10, 12:13, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
You try to renice I/O bound
processes. The scheduler priority only matters when processes are CPU
bound.
Yes of course, but... all my dd processes use CPU.
After run dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null
first three dd if=/dev/wd0c
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:45:39PM +0400, Dmitry-T wrote:
11.10.10, 12:13, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
You try to renice I/O bound
processes. The scheduler priority only matters when processes are CPU
bound.
Yes of course, but... all my dd processes use CPU.
After
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:45:39PM +0400, Dmitry-T wrote:
11.10.10, 12:13, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
You try to renice I/O bound
processes. The scheduler priority only matters when processes are CPU
bound.
Yes of course, but... all my dd processes use CPU.
After
2010/10/11, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
CPU consumed by the kernel is not accounted by the scheduler. All the
work done by urandom is system time.
And for the curious people who can't see the obvious: why is that?
--
Martin Pelikan
11.10.10, 13:57, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
After run dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null
first three dd if=/dev/wd0c of=/dev/null bs=1m reduce their part of CPU
and
run renice not recover their part of CPU.
CPU consumed by the kernel is not accounted by the scheduler.
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:27:45 +0400
Dmitry-T dmitr...@yandex.ru wrote:
11.10.10, 08:46, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com:
6) Did you test it on real OpenBSD, real HW and latest release or snapshot?
http://bsdanywhere.org/faq
What is the primary focus of BSDanywhere?
A mostly
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:16:19PM +0200, Martin Pelikan wrote:
2010/10/11, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
CPU consumed by the kernel is not accounted by the scheduler. All the
work done by urandom is system time.
And for the curious people who can't see the obvious: why is that?
Don't compare OpenBSD and Linux, because OpenBSD and Linux are made
differently. As claudio mentioned nice make sense *only* for CPU tasks,
not IO tasks. So if you don't like it keep using Linux, otherwise you
must live with how OpenBSD is doing things.
On 10/11/2010 6:37 AM, Dmitry-T wrote:
10.10.10, 14:51, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk:
It is not secure. One script or program may load CPU and
database or another servers lost speed in disk operations.
Even if renice did have that affect you need to be root to drop it to
-20 so why shouldn't root be able to use all
11.10.10, 22:02, GP l...@nnt.lt:
Don't compare OpenBSD and Linux, because OpenBSD and Linux are made
differently. As claudio mentioned nice make sense *only* for CPU tasks,
not IO tasks. So if you don't like it keep using Linux, otherwise you
must live with how OpenBSD is doing things.
I
11.10.10, 15:13, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:16:19PM +0200, Martin Pelikan wrote:
2010/10/11, Claudio Jeker :
CPU consumed by the kernel is not accounted by the scheduler. All the
work done by urandom is system time.
And for the curious
11.10.10, 13:16, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com:
Yes of course, but... all my dd processes use CPU.
After run dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null
first three dd if=/dev/wd0c of=/dev/null bs=1m reduce their part of CPU
and
run renice not recover their part of CPU.
numbers
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Dmitry-T dmitr...@yandex.ru wrote:
In FreeBSD and Mac OS X run dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null
not change read speed from disk...
Is in OpenBSD lacks developers?
Maybe.
But it doesn't lack moronic whiners on its mailing lists, that's for sure!
-david-
On 10/11/10 02:27, Dmitry-T wrote:
11.10.10, 08:46, Tomas Bodzartomas.bod...@gmail.com:
6) Did you test it on real OpenBSD, real HW and latest release or snapshot?
I'm search stable and secure OS.
I'm test: my work Mac OS X 10.6.3, FreeBSD 8.1 on livecd
frenzy-1.3-ju-release-rus, my home
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:34:22 +0400
Dmitry-T dmitr...@yandex.ru wrote:
11.10.10, 15:13, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:16:19PM +0200, Martin Pelikan wrote:
2010/10/11, Claudio Jeker :
CPU consumed by the kernel is not accounted by the scheduler.
Read again and again Claudio's responses until you really understand.
The key is there.
--
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will
Dmitry-T == Dmitry-T dmitr...@yandex.ru writes:
Dmitry-T Is in OpenBSD lacks developers?
That might as well be the last message you post here.
Any little help you would get, you've just offended them.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
Dmitry-T Is in OpenBSD lacks developers?
That might as well be the last message you post here.
Any little help you would get, you've just offended them.
reading his e-mails, I don't think he is trying to be offensive, I think
his English is just poor
thank you
11.10.10, 23:43, GP l...@nnt.lt:
As far as I know this is not possible.
On 10/11/2010 7:24 AM, Dmitry-T wrote:
11.10.10, 22:02, GP :
Don't compare OpenBSD and Linux, because OpenBSD and Linux are made
differently. As claudio mentioned nice make sense *only* for CPU
11.10.10, 19:29, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com:
Dmitry-T == Dmitry-T writes:
Dmitry-T Is in OpenBSD lacks developers?
That might as well be the last message you post here.
Any little help you would get, you've just offended them.
I did not want to offend. Maybe the
11.10.10, 19:35, Michal mic...@sharescope.co.uk:
Dmitry-T Is in OpenBSD lacks developers?
That might as well be the last message you post here.
Any little help you would get, you've just offended them.
reading his e-mails, I don't think he is trying to be offensive, I think
on 2.6.35 libre) renice work correct...
Why renice not work in OpenBSD?
--
Dmitry Telegin
2010/10/10 Dmitry-T dmitr...@yandex.ru:
load from livecd bsdanywhere46-amd64
Then go to http://bsdanywhere.org/mailinglists and complain there.
Best
Martin
- throughput not change!
For check renice, run renice -20 for last dd - OpenBSD froze, even mouse.
It is not secure. One script or program may load CPU and
database or another servers lost speed in disk operations.
In Linux (test on 2.6.35 libre) renice work correct...
Why renice not work
37 matches
Mail list logo
