Re: a thankyou to OpenBSD

2015-02-17 Thread Stefan Wollny
Am 02/11/15 um 01:26 schrieb Diana Eichert: > I don't post much any more, my OpenBSD systems "just work". > > Just wanted to post a thank you to OpenBSD because it does > "just work". > > My day job entails a lot of Linux support, lately I've been > dealing with the big screwup associated with ne

Re: a thankyou to OpenBSD

2015-02-11 Thread Артур Истомин
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:36:19AM -0500, trondd wrote: > On 2/10/15, Diana Eichert wrote: > > names to something more useful than "p3p2"!!!. > > > That's an easy one. I have "eno16780032". Awesome. It is somehow related to network interfaces layout on motherboard. This stupid default already 3

Re: a thankyou to OpenBSD

2015-02-11 Thread trondd
On 2/10/15, Diana Eichert wrote: > names to something more useful than "p3p2"!!!. > That's an easy one. I have "eno16780032". Awesome. I try to stay away from as much of the Linux configuration as possible and administer the applications. My contribution is running "yum upgrade" every 3 days o

Re: a thankyou to OpenBSD

2015-02-11 Thread David Coppa
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > I don't know if you know this, but just put net.ifnames=0 in your > kernel's parameters and it will revert to the old way. As usual with linux, every new enhancement or modification is always accompanied by a knob to fully annihilate

OT Linux rant Was: a thankyou to OpenBSD

2015-02-11 Thread Diana Eichert
Oh yeah, systemd. The new and improved init replacement. It sure looks less complex, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd#mediaviewer/File:Systemd_components.svg Yeah, I know about net.ifnames=0, but that just gets you back to the ethX paradigm. So very "helpful" in a very generic way. What ab

Re: a thankyou to OpenBSD

2015-02-11 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
On 10-02-2015 22:26, Diana Eichert wrote: > My day job entails a lot of Linux support, lately I've been > dealing with the big screwup associated with network interface > naming. WHY can't Linux follow BSD's straightforward NIC > naming? This answer is a simple one: systemd > It's positively bizar

Re: a thankyou to OpenBSD

2015-02-11 Thread Bob Beck
Wave.. Thanks Diana. I still owe you a beer or thirteen. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Diana Eichert wrote: > I don't post much any more, my OpenBSD systems "just work". > > Just wanted to post a thank you to OpenBSD because it does > "just work". > > My day job entails a lot of Linux support

a thankyou to OpenBSD

2015-02-10 Thread Diana Eichert
I don't post much any more, my OpenBSD systems "just work". Just wanted to post a thank you to OpenBSD because it does "just work". My day job entails a lot of Linux support, lately I've been dealing with the big screwup associated with network interface naming. WHY can't Linux follow BSD's str