On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:30:07AM -0800, Doran Mori wrote:
>
> Ok, I didn't realize the interface name was sufficient.
>
> I would of have never looked at pppoe(4) unless you told me about it.
>
that was just an example. i didn;t expect you to logically end up there ;)
> I suggest just adding
> hi. i've talked to claudio a bit about this, and i think it's not gonna
> go in. the man page is fairly clear that ifp is the interface name, and
> -ifa its address. if you look closely you'll see that, for better or for
> worse, the whole page is written in that style. i'm not sure that the
> te
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:37:32PM -0800, Doran Mori wrote:
> Sorry I'm not man enough...err savvy enough to know the man page ways
> to write the needed lingo.
>
> Could somebody update the man page for route with the following gist:
>
> In a change or add command where the destination and
Sorry I'm not man enough...err savvy enough to know the man page ways
to write the needed lingo.
Could somebody update the man page for route with the following gist:
In a change or add command where the destination and gateway are not suf-
ficient to specify the route, the -ifp or -ifa
4 matches
Mail list logo
