Re: altq on enc0?

2008-09-11 Thread Markus Friedl
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: I've just discovered that this is unsupported. How difficult would it be to add support for this? why not just tag the packet on enc0 and altq on the 'real' interface?

Re: altq on enc0?

2008-09-11 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 11.09.2008 at 10:05:36 +0200, Markus Friedl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: I've just discovered that this is unsupported. How difficult would it be to add support for this? why not just tag the packet on enc0 and altq

altq on enc0?

2008-09-10 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I've just discovered that this is unsupported. How difficult would it be to add support for this? TIA! Kind regards, --Toni++