anoncvs + OPENBSD_3_9_BASE

2006-03-15 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hi, I unsuccessfully tried to retrieve the OPENBSD_3_9_BASE via anoncvs. At this time, is this tag blocked/denied until the official release or is it possible to download them? Thank you Didier

Re: anoncvs + OPENBSD_3_9_BASE

2006-03-15 Thread David T Harris
I believe that all access to any 3.9 installation files via ftp/cvs etc... is not available currently and will not be available in the future until 3.9 is released.

Re: anoncvs + OPENBSD_3_9_BASE

2006-03-16 Thread Jason Crawford
On 3/15/06, Didier Wiroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I unsuccessfully tried to retrieve the OPENBSD_3_9_BASE via anoncvs. > At this time, is this tag blocked/denied until the official release or is it > possible to download them? I run my own anoncvs mirror that syncs against anoncvs3.u

Re: anoncvs + OPENBSD_3_9_BASE

2006-03-23 Thread Bob Bostwick \(Lists\)
Is that why /snapshots/packages/i386/ is not available? I'm probably going to get yelled at for asking this, but I really don't know the answer. I just upgraded to -current, if I can't use /snapshots/packages/i386/ for installing packages, where should I install from? Yes I ordered a 3.9 CD, but

Re: anoncvs + OPENBSD_3_9_BASE

2006-03-23 Thread Jason Crawford
On 3/23/06, Bob Bostwick (Lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that why /snapshots/packages/i386/ is not available? I'm probably > going to get yelled at for asking this, but I really don't know the > answer. I just upgraded to -current, if I can't use > /snapshots/packages/i386/ for installing

Re: anoncvs + OPENBSD_3_9_BASE

2006-03-23 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Is that why /snapshots/packages/i386/ is not available? During the 3.9 release cycle BUILDS we run out of space in our FTP partition temporarily. And so do quite a few mirrors -- so we are cautious in this regard. The packages for one release are 19GB. Considering that most FTP sites contain

Re: anoncvs + OPENBSD_3_9_BASE

2006-03-23 Thread Ted Unangst
On 3/23/06, Bob Bostwick (Lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that why /snapshots/packages/i386/ is not available? I'm probably > going to get yelled at for asking this, but I really don't know the > answer. I just upgraded to -current, if I can't use > /snapshots/packages/i386/ for installing