On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:00:45 +0200, Theo de Raadt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is, libc bumps happen when functions change in interesting ways.
Just out of curiosity: This is not an update to keep the libc version
number in-sync with the OpenBSD release? It would have remained on 39 if
the
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:03:55 +0200, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 10/15/06, Bernd Schoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:56:07 +0200, Joachim Schipper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is, libc bumps happen when functions change in interesting ways.
Just out o
> > It is, libc bumps happen when functions change in interesting ways.
>
> Just out of curiosity: This is not an update to keep the libc version
> number in-sync with the OpenBSD release? It would have remained on 39 if
> there would not have been a change in the interface or semantics?
Of c
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:56:07 +0200, Joachim Schipper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is, libc bumps happen when functions change in interesting ways.
Just out of curiosity: This is not an update to keep the libc version
number in-sync with the OpenBSD release? It would have remained on 39 if
On 10/13/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A quick fix that worked for me (don't know if it's "bad" to do this or
> not, though):
>
> # cd /usr/lib
> # ln -s libc.so.40.0 libc.so.39.3
It is, libc bumps happen when functions change in interesting ways.
A-ha. Good to know. :-)
"Christian Weisgerber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I expect a new snapshot to be available by Monday.
(Building a full package snapshot now takes ~68 hours on the Xeon
2.66 GHz dedicated to the job. If somebody wants to donate a new
high-end machine for the task, talk to Theo what his rack can
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:56:07AM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
> On 10/13/06, Bernd Schoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Do I have to switch to using ports? Any other fix for the problem?
>
> A quick fix that worked for me (don't know if it's "bad" to do this or
> not, though):
>
> # cd /usr/
Bernd Schoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to do a fresh install using a current snapshot (tried it with
> the snapshot from yesterday and today) on i386.
>
> I get the report of a wrong libc available: [...]
> As expected the libc is c.40.0 [...]
>
> I assume that because of the
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Bernd Schoeller wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am trying to do a fresh install using a current snapshot (tried it with
> the snapshot from yesterday and today) on i386. I am downloading from
> 'mirror.switch.ch' and 'ftp.de.openbsd.org'. After install
On 10/13/06, Bernd Schoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do I have to switch to using ports? Any other fix for the problem?
A quick fix that worked for me (don't know if it's "bad" to do this or
not, though):
# cd /usr/lib
# ln -s libc.so.40.0 libc.so.39.3
-Martin
--
"Suburbia is where the
You can make a symbolic link :
# ln -s /usr/lib/libc.so.39.2 /usr/lib/libc.so.39.3
That's I do to fix this probleme :)
* Bernd Schoeller :
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am trying to do a fresh install using a current snapshot (tried it with
> the snapshot from yesterday and today) on i386. I am d
Hello everybody,
I am trying to do a fresh install using a current snapshot (tried it with
the snapshot from yesterday and today) on i386. I am downloading from
'mirror.switch.ch' and 'ftp.de.openbsd.org'. After installation, I try to
install some packages that I need (from
pub/OpenBSD/sn
12 matches
Mail list logo
