On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:55:03PM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
>
> ok, here's something that doesn't look right (hmm, I should
> probably file a bug?)
>
you don;t need to open bug reports for this stuff - just let us know. in
this case it looks like the Pf macro is misbehaving. i've mailed
krist
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010, Marc Espie wrote:
> This should indeed be reported, thanks.
ok, here's something that doesn't look right (hmm, I should
probably file a bug?)
man sh (snapshot i386 from today):
The following forms of parameter substitution can also be used:
Pf ${#name}
Yes, there are still bugs in mandoc(1), and... we hope they will
get fixed.
Keep looking, keep reporting them -- to schwarze and kristaps
in particular.
> > This should indeed be reported, thanks.
>
> ok, here's something that doesn't look right (hmm, I should
> probably file a bug?)
>
> man sh
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:46:30AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
> Are formatting problems in the man pages currently expected due to
> the change to mandoc or should those be reported as bugs? I installed
> a snapshot form 2010-04-02 and saw this layout (same for 2010-04-05
> http://obsd.cec.mtu.ed
Are formatting problems in the man pages currently expected due to
the change to mandoc or should those be reported as bugs? I installed
a snapshot form 2010-04-02 and saw this layout (same for 2010-04-05
http://obsd.cec.mtu.edu/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/man47.tgz)
./usr/share/man/cat1/tr.0
5 matches
Mail list logo
