On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 07:42:05PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:16:59PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote:
> > Recent FAQ cleanup lost a reference to mg(1) (section 2.2).
> >
> > Text editors seem fundamental enough to include in help.1.
> >
> > While here, make consistent use of r
>Why not ed?
And why not list all commands??
Because it is unneccessary. I believe you are not trying to
contribute anything valuable with your comment.
> From: "Pavan Maddamsetti"
> To: "misc"
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 10:55:28 PM
> Subject: Re: diff for help.1
>
> Why not ed?
vi(1) mentions ex(1) which is maybe good enough for a new user.
Both the "Welcome to OpenBSD" email messa
Why not ed?
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:16:59PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote:
> Recent FAQ cleanup lost a reference to mg(1) (section 2.2).
>
> Text editors seem fundamental enough to include in help.1.
>
> While here, make consistent use of references to command arguments (Ar).
>
> Rob
Sorry - clean diff with s
Recent FAQ cleanup lost a reference to mg(1) (section 2.2).
Text editors seem fundamental enough to include in help.1.
While here, make consistent use of references to command arguments (Ar).
Rob
Index: help.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/sr
6 matches
Mail list logo