Re: diff for help.1

2016-04-17 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 07:42:05PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:16:59PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote: > > Recent FAQ cleanup lost a reference to mg(1) (section 2.2). > > > > Text editors seem fundamental enough to include in help.1. > > > > While here, make consistent use of r

Re: diff for help.1

2016-04-16 Thread Theo de Raadt
>Why not ed? And why not list all commands?? Because it is unneccessary. I believe you are not trying to contribute anything valuable with your comment.

Re: diff for help.1

2016-04-16 Thread Rob Pierce
> From: "Pavan Maddamsetti" > To: "misc" > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 10:55:28 PM > Subject: Re: diff for help.1 > > Why not ed? vi(1) mentions ex(1) which is maybe good enough for a new user. Both the "Welcome to OpenBSD" email messa

Re: diff for help.1

2016-04-15 Thread Pavan Maddamsetti
Why not ed?

Re: diff for help.1

2016-04-15 Thread Rob Pierce
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:16:59PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote: > Recent FAQ cleanup lost a reference to mg(1) (section 2.2). > > Text editors seem fundamental enough to include in help.1. > > While here, make consistent use of references to command arguments (Ar). > > Rob Sorry - clean diff with s

diff for help.1

2016-04-15 Thread Rob Pierce
Recent FAQ cleanup lost a reference to mg(1) (section 2.2). Text editors seem fundamental enough to include in help.1. While here, make consistent use of references to command arguments (Ar). Rob Index: help.1 === RCS file: /cvs/sr