Re: differences in reported disk size (starring bioctl, fdisk, disklabel also starring "Hewlett-Packard Smart Array")

2010-01-01 Thread Denis Doroshenko
On 1/1/10, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 06:16:35PM +0200, Denis Doroshenko wrote: > > > hi, > > > > this message may be a little too long, the most intriguing part is the > > difference between sizes reported by the kernel (in dmesg) and bioctl. > > any idea, why bioctl repo

Re: differences in reported disk size (starring bioctl, fdisk, disklabel also starring "Hewlett-Packard Smart Array")

2010-01-01 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 06:16:35PM +0200, Denis Doroshenko wrote: > hi, > > this message may be a little too long, the most intriguing part is the > difference between sizes reported by the kernel (in dmesg) and bioctl. > any idea, why bioctl reports size 1 TB smaller? > > i've got HP proliant d

differences in reported disk size (starring bioctl, fdisk, disklabel also starring "Hewlett-Packard Smart Array")

2009-12-31 Thread Denis Doroshenko
hi, this message may be a little too long, the most intriguing part is the difference between sizes reported by the kernel (in dmesg) and bioctl. any idea, why bioctl reports size 1 TB smaller? i've got HP proliant dl140 with "Hewlett-Packard Smart Array" card in it. put a couple of 1.5 TB disks