hello,
what do you think of adding a faq item which will give example how /tmp (or
any other write intensive temp disk partition) can be stored in mfs drive?
Ilya Shipitsin
On 01/26/14 11:31, éÌØÑ ûÉÐÉÃÉÎ wrote:
hello,
what do you think of adding a faq item which will give example how /tmp (or
any other write intensive temp disk partition) can be stored in mfs drive?
Ilya Shipitsin
well... no.
First, at this point, tmpfs is hopefully going to be replacing
Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
First, at this point, tmpfs is hopefully going to be replacing mfs (see
mount_tmpfs(8)).
A word of caution: So far, if pushed hard enough, tmpfs is
(1) losing files and (2) slower than actual storage on SSD.
(I haven't tried with mfs.)
--
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 05:44:05PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
First, at this point, tmpfs is hopefully going to be replacing mfs (see
mount_tmpfs(8)).
A word of caution: So far, if pushed hard enough, tmpfs is
(1) losing files and
26.1.2014 18:31, Илья Шипицин kirjoitti:
hello,
what do you think of adding a faq item which will give example how /tmp (or
any other write intensive temp disk partition) can be stored in mfs drive?
Ilya Shipitsin
Now that OpenBSD has tmpfs I'd use that instead of mfs.
I just added
previously on this list Timo Myyrä contributed:
Now that OpenBSD has tmpfs I'd use that instead of mfs.
I just added following on my /etc/fstab:
none /tmp tmpfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=1g,-m=1777 0 0
none /var/cache tmpfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=128m,-m=0755 0 0
none /var/run tmpfs
6 matches
Mail list logo