On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:00:28AM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
BTW, any particular reason for wanting to switch back? Something not
working right or a regression in performance or behavior?
They behave differently; with rthreads multi-threaded processes
tend to get more cpu than single
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:10:09 -0700 PQ Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Mo Libden m0lib...@mail.ru wrote:
I wrote a two string program to check rthreads, it looks really interesting!
I am interested how do I get pure userland library back in case I need?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Mo Libden m0lib...@mail.ru wrote:
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:10:09 -0700 PQ Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com:
...
Running -current with userland threads is not supported. If you need
userland threads, you need to run 5.1 or earlier.
That was what I really
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:00:28 -0700 PQ Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Mo Libden m0lib...@mail.ru wrote:
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:10:09 -0700 PQ Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com:
...
Running -current with userland threads is not supported. If you need
Hi!
I wrote a two string program to check rthreads, it looks really interesting!
I am interested how do I get pure userland library back in case I need?
Just setting kern.rthreads=0 seems to be not enough: pthread_create()
fails this case as not supported.
Do I need to link the program against
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Mo Libden m0lib...@mail.ru wrote:
I wrote a two string program to check rthreads, it looks really interesting!
I am interested how do I get pure userland library back in case I need?
Just setting kern.rthreads=0 seems to be not enough: pthread_create()
fails
6 matches
Mail list logo
