Re: Fw: Re: https://undeadly.org

>> In the near future, webbrowsers will start to mark the non-https pages "red". I don't agree that https everywhere is a good thing for technical and social reasons (making insecure sites look secure and pandering to them/avoiding their discovery). I sense I may get even more irritated with the

Re: https://undeadly.org

I vaguely recall this sort of thing happening before with deadly.org; this is how undeadly.org started. Maybe undeadly.org will turn into [something with a zombie-like name].org? On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:59:24 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017-02-28, minek van

Re: Fw: Re: https://undeadly.org

I have used and enjoyed undeadly for around ten years, and wish to acknowledge Paul for having been helpful to me on more than one occasion. -- Edward Ahlsen-Girard Ft Walton Beach, FL

Re: Fw: Re: https://undeadly.org

On 2017-02-28, minek van wrote: > fyi, undeadly.org has problems. [snip] After a mail like this, if I was hosting the site I would probably just pull the plug.

Re: Fw: Re: https://undeadly.org

;minek...@mail.com>, fundrais...@openbsdfoundation.org | Subject: Re: Fw: Re: https://undeadly.org | | The Foundation has nothing to do with undeadly.org[http://undeadly.org] beyond | using it occasionally to communicate with the community. |   Ken | |   | | On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 06:04 minek van |

Re: Fw: Re: https://undeadly.org

It is usually not considered polite to forward private mails to mailing lists. -- I'm not entirely sure you are real.

Re: Fw: Re: https://undeadly.org

fyi, undeadly.org has problems. Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 at 5:49 PM From: "Kenneth Westerback" <kwesterb...@gmail.com> To: "minek van" <minek...@mail.com>, fundrais...@openbsdfoundation.org Subject: Re: Fw: Re: https://undeadly.org The Foundation has