Re: inet6 ff02::1:ff routes leaking?

2016-07-13 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 06/07/16(Wed) 06:53, Aaron Riekenberg wrote: > Hi Martin - > > Thanks for the patch. > > It installed ok on my 5.9 stable system. patch failed to process it - I > think because line numbers have changed. But it was not too difficult to > install it manually. Thanks, it has been committed an

Re: inet6 ff02::1:ff routes leaking?

2016-07-10 Thread Aaron Riekenberg
Have been running with this for several days, still working fine. On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Aaron Riekenberg wrote: > Hi Martin - > > Thanks for the patch. > > It installed ok on my 5.9 stable system. patch failed to process it - I > think because line numbers have changed. But it was no

Re: inet6 ff02::1:ff routes leaking?

2016-07-06 Thread Aaron Riekenberg
Hi Martin - Thanks for the patch. It installed ok on my 5.9 stable system. patch failed to process it - I think because line numbers have changed. But it was not too difficult to install it manually. Thing seem to be working ok so far. I will keep watching and let you know. This is what I se

Re: inet6 ff02::1:ff routes leaking?

2016-07-05 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Hello Aaron, On 24/06/16(Fri) 06:25, Aaron Riekenberg wrote: > I am running an OpenBSD 5.9 box as a firewall/router on a Comcast cable > connection. My box has 2 interfaces: em0 on external network (cable modem) > and em1 on internal network. I have applied all available patches for 5.9. > > Fo

inet6 ff02::1:ff routes leaking?

2016-06-24 Thread Aaron Riekenberg
I am running an OpenBSD 5.9 box as a firewall/router on a Comcast cable connection. My box has 2 interfaces: em0 on external network (cable modem) and em1 on internal network. I have applied all available patches for 5.9. For ipv6 I'm running wide-dhcpv6 package to get a non-temporary address on