On 06/07/16(Wed) 06:53, Aaron Riekenberg wrote:
> Hi Martin -
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> It installed ok on my 5.9 stable system. patch failed to process it - I
> think because line numbers have changed. But it was not too difficult to
> install it manually.
Thanks, it has been committed an
Have been running with this for several days, still working fine.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Aaron Riekenberg wrote:
> Hi Martin -
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> It installed ok on my 5.9 stable system. patch failed to process it - I
> think because line numbers have changed. But it was no
Hi Martin -
Thanks for the patch.
It installed ok on my 5.9 stable system. patch failed to process it - I
think because line numbers have changed. But it was not too difficult to
install it manually.
Thing seem to be working ok so far. I will keep watching and let you know.
This is what I se
Hello Aaron,
On 24/06/16(Fri) 06:25, Aaron Riekenberg wrote:
> I am running an OpenBSD 5.9 box as a firewall/router on a Comcast cable
> connection. My box has 2 interfaces: em0 on external network (cable modem)
> and em1 on internal network. I have applied all available patches for 5.9.
>
> Fo
I am running an OpenBSD 5.9 box as a firewall/router on a Comcast cable
connection. My box has 2 interfaces: em0 on external network (cable modem)
and em1 on internal network. I have applied all available patches for 5.9.
For ipv6 I'm running wide-dhcpv6 package to get a non-temporary address on
5 matches
Mail list logo